Smt. Devabhaktuni Vijaya Lakshmi vs. Assessing Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The Court made the following: ORDER
ffi/*/ ,/ ,/ I! IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE S'TATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE THE CHIEFJUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN Writ Petition No.ll370 of 2026 Dated: 16.04.2026 Between: Smt. Devabhaktuni Vr.laya Lakshrni ... Petitioner and Assessing Officer, CCST Division, Ajmer and 4 othcrs Respondents ORDER Sri K.B. Narasimhulu, learned counsel rcpresents Sri G. Venkata Reddy, learned counscl lbr the pctitioner Sri D. Raghavendar Rao. learned St:nior Standing Counsel fbr Central Goods and Services -l'ax appears lirr respondcnt Nos. I and 2 Sri Mahesh Raje, learned Govemment Pleader for Home appears lor respondent No.3
This writ petition is filed rvith the lirllowing relief: "For the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is most rcspectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue arr appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a Writ of Ccrtiorali-cum-Mandamus calling for the entire records pertaining to the Ordcr- in -Origina I dated ]|8.09.2024 passed by Respondcnts I and 2 and quash the sarne as being illegal, arbitrary', withoul juri iction and violatire ol'the principles of natural justice and Articlcs l4 and 2l of the Constitution ol lndia. ltis flurther prayed tlrat this l{on'ble Court may declare that lastening tax liability t L
2 upon the l,elitioncr. \\irhout an) materral establishing her involvement, participation. control or benefit in the allegeJ transactions, ts unconstitutional and unsustainable in law. It is further prayed that this Hon ble Coun rnal direct coordination betu,een Respondenis I to I the Telangana C_rbcr ( rrrnc Police and CGSI- authorities to identify and prosccute rhe actLral perpctrators and restrain Respondents I and 2 from irr it ral i g cr corrt rrru ing arry r()crc i\ e rccoven . dnachment. prosecution or penal action agarnst the petitioner pending completion oi investigation and pass such other order or orders as this Hon,ble Court may deern fit and proper in thc intcrests of.iUStrce.' To,
Apparentll, thc relieI pra).ed lor is against the order-in_original. datcd 18.09.202-l irnposing tax liability on rhe peritioner and consequential proccedings lor realization ol thc same by ad.yudicating authorities under the Ccntral (ioods anrl Scrr.iccs 't ax. t)ivision-J. A.imer. No part ol cause of action ariscs \vithin the juri iction of this Court. Thercfore. aftcr sorne argumcnts. lcarned counsel for the petitioncr seeks permission to rvithdraw this rvrit petition in order to approach thc appropriate authority or Court ol law havine.juri iction o\ cr the sub-iect rnattcr.
Accordingly, thc writ perition IS dismissed as rvithdrarvn. The pctrtroner mav have thc libertl as permissible in law //// . L.VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR , \..J- \_-./ SECTION OFFICER
One CC to SRI GOLAMARU VENKATA REDDY, Advocate, [OPUC]
One CC to SRI D.RAGHAVENDRA RAO, (SR SC FOR CBIC) [OPUCI
Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
Two CCs to GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI
One CC to SRI N.BHUJANGA RAO, Deputy Solicitor General of lndia' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. IOPUC]
Two CD Copies. BSK zsk 1,r rKS .il I
HIGH COURT DATED: 1610412026 ORDER WP.No.11370 of 2026 o (.r Te DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS fl Tf{€ s,4 rrlHrt * .ih -r\\ 07 I,IATW * { o ( I-i '.V f' i I \ o t f i I I 1
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.