Aurobindo Pharma Limited vs. State Of Telangana

WP/13727/2026HC TelanganaGSTCNR HBHC01028340202629 April 2026Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO36 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court, noting that an identical matter involving the same petitioner was previously decided, followed that precedent. It set aside the impugned orders, directing the original authority to reconsider the refund claims in light of the Gujarat High Court judgments in *Atul Limited* and *Patson Papers Private Limited*, which held that such refunds are permissible for zero-rated supplies.

Facts

Aurobindo Pharma Limited sought a refund of accumulated unutilized Compensation Cess paid on inputs used for manufacturing goods that were either exported (zero-rated supplies) or supplied to SEZ (exempted from tax). The Appellate Joint Commissioner rejected these refund claims, leading the petitioner to file multiple writ petitions challenging these orders.

Key Issues

Whether a taxpayer is entitled to a refund of unutilized Compensation Cess paid on inputs used for manufacturing goods that are subsequently exported or supplied to SEZ, which are zero-rated or exempted from tax.

Sections Cited

Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

t [ 348s ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NOS: 13688. 13689.'13690 .13707.137 12. 13717.',13726 13727 13728. 13730.13733.13734. 13735. 13736 . 13738. 13739.13740. 13742 13743 13745,1 3747. 13748.'.|.3753. 13755. 13782 AND 13786 0F 2026 W.P.NO: 13688 OF 2026 Between: Aurobindo Pharma Limited, Plot No.1, Survey No.83/1 , Galaxy Tower, Floor Nos. 22-24, Hyderabad Knowledge City Raidu rg Panmaktha, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad - 500032, Telangana, lndia Rep by its Authorised Signatory, Mr. T. Deepak ...PETITIONER AND 1. State of Telangana, Revenue (Commercial Tax) Department Rep by its Secretary.

2.

Deputy Commissioner (ST), STU-1, Punjagutta Division, Hyderabad'

3.

Appellate Joint commissioner of state Tax, Punjagutta Division, 5th Floor, C.T. Complex, NamPallY, HYderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.