M/S. Om Sanitary vs. The Union Of INDIA
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The Court made the following: ORDER OOP OORILLA' SPL. GP FOR STATE TAX
AT HYDERABAD AND N 6 Between: M/s. Om SanitarY ...Petitioner and ffi .1],, il."JJlr1,?'r, rvr r n i.s11' o r rr i n ance ( D ep artment o r Rev enue)' N*h Block, New Delhi - I 10 00 I ' and 4 others' ...ResPondents ORDER: Learned counsel Sri S'Sunil Kumar appears for the petitioner' SriSwaroopoorilla,learnedSpecialGovernmentPleaderfor State Tax, appears for respondents No'2 to 5' 2.TheGoodsandServicesTax(GS't)registrationcertif-tcateofthe petitioner bearing No'368ZOPM7940RlZ8 was cancelled vide { impugned order passed in Form GST REG-19 dated 18'08'2025 on the Dated:01.07'2026
2 -- I ground that the registration was obtained by, means of fraud, wirful misstatement or suppression of facts. The petitioner preferred an appeal on 13'11'2025 against the said order, which was dismissed by respondent No'5 on 30.05.2026 as being devoid of merits. Thereafter, the petitioner has fired the instant writ petition for revocation of cancellation of GST registration. 3' Learned counser for the petitioner subrnits that the petitioner,s GST registration was cancered on the sore aregation that the taxpayer had the same trade name and same registered rnobire number as a different registered person operating from the registered address. Aggrieved by the sarne, the petitioner has preferred an appear, which was dismissed observing that the petitioner faired to produce any varid documentary evidence, though such documents were aregedry fired along with the appeal memorandum. 4' Learned Speciar Government preader for State Tax submits that the apparent reason for canceration of petitioner,s GST registration was that the registration was obtained by means of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of f'acts. I
CBry 3
Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we are inclined to allow liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority within a period of two weeks from today for submission of application for revocation of cancellation of GST registration in physical form. The competent authority would entertain it and take a decision thereupon in accordance with law within a period of three weeks thereaflter.
The instant writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. .P.PONNA KRISHNA REGISTRAR //" ECTION OFFICER To 1. The Secretary, Union of lndia, Ministry of Finance North Block, New Delhi 110 001. of Revenue), 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
PSK. TKS The secretary, commercial raxes Department, Government of relangana, c.T. complex, Nampally, Hyderabad, state of relangana - 500 001. The commissioner of state Tax (GST), Telangan",t.T. complex, Nampally, Hyderabad - 500 001. The Deputy State Tax Officer, Jeedimetla-ll Circle, Hyderabad Rural Division, Hyderabad. The Appellate Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Hyderabad Rural Division, Sth Floor, C.T. Complex, Nampally, Hyderabad _ SOO 001. One CC to SRI S.SUN|L KUMAR, Advocate tOpUCl one cc to sRt N.BHUJANGA RAo, DEpury sollcroR GENERAL oF rNDtA [OPUC] one cc to sRt swARoop ooRtLLA, spl. cp FoR srATE TAx topucl Two CD Copies &
HIGH COUR DATED: 0110712026 ORDER WP.No.20385 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRI HOUT COSTS. ufoo si J\)L ?$?t S tATE OA I .a) * I a\ .., il?s
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.