M/S. Sri Ramanjaneya Fertilizers vs. Deputy State Tax Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN WRIT PETITION No. 22375 of 2026 DATED :15.07.2026 Between M/s. Sri Ramananeya Fertilizers, Rep., by its Proprietor, Mr. Dhanavath Ravi, # l-2412, Main Road, Kamanchikunta Thanda, Mattampally Mandal, Suryapet District, Telangana. . . . Petitioner AND Deputy State Tax Officer, O/o. Assistant Commissioner (State Taxes) Kodad Circle, Nalgonda Division, Telangana and 2 others. Respondents ORDER: Mr. K.P. Amamath Reddy, leamed counsel for the petitioner Mr. Sri Swaroop Oorilla, leamed Special Govemment Pleader for State Tax appears for respondent Nos. 1 and 2
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration certificate of the petitioner bearing No.36ESQPR0489JlZU was cancelled vide imptgned order passed in Form GST REG-19 dated 01.10.2025 on the ground that person does not conduct any business from declared place of business/place of business not found
2 3 . L eametl counsel fbr the petitioner submits that the petitioner came to know about cancellation of its registration when it approached its suppliers for purchase ol f'ertilizcrs and pesticides. He submits that respondent No.1 instead of inspecting the registered premises ol the petitionerw'hich has been mentioned in the registration cerlificate has inspected the r.vrong premises and issued the show cause notice and passed the impugned order. Fle submits that when the petitioner tried to file rcvocation application in the GST portal. it is not permitted to do so. as time of 27() dal s tbr filing revocation application is lapsed.
I-earned Special Government Pleader for State Tax submits that if the petitioner makes an application for revocation of cancellation of registration manualll. the sarnc rvill be considered b1' the competellt authority 5. , I laving regald to the atbresaid lacts and circr.tmstances and also taking note of the fact that the (iST registration certificate of the petitioner was cancelled on the ground that person does not conduct anv business from declared place o1' businessi place o1'business not found, if the petitioner approaches the competent authorit)' * ithin a period of one r'veek from todal for submission of application lor revocation of cancellation of GS'I registration certificate, in phy'sical lorm. thc competent authority rvould entertain it and take a decision thereupon in accordance with lau'rvithin a period ofthree weeks thereafter.
J The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. . A,H.S.GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGIST //II ECTION OFFICER BM TKS V{-
The Deputy state Tax officer, o/o Assistant commissioner (state Taxes), Kodad Circle, Nalgonda Divrsion, Telangana.
The secretary to Government (Revenue) cr-I, state Taxes / commerciar Taxes Department, Secretarrat, Hyderabad.
The lvlanager, State Bank of lndia, I\,4attampally Branch, Mattampally, Suryapet District, Telangana
One CC to SRl. K P. AMARNATH REDDy, Advocate tOpUCl
Two ccs to SPECTAL GOVERNMENT FoR srATE TAX, High court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
Two CD Copies 6 To,
HIGH COURT DATED: 1510712026 ORDER WP.No.22375 of 2026 .r'; 51,-1 ,. Y '/k ? 4 JLt 2'ui6 f. i(/ t i D5spArcH DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS a :C-' qr-, --14\) rI\ ' (
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.