M/S.999 Pan Masala vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Original PDF →
WP/12660/2021HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01022021202129 March 2026Bench: K SREENIVASA REDDY6 pages
For Petitioner: G RAMACHANDRA REDDYFor Respondent: GP FOR HOME, GP FOR MED HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Heard together (2 matters)

W.P.No.12660 of 2021
W.P.No.16118/20

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
APHC010220212021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 12660/2021 Between: 1. M/S.999 PAN MASALA, D.NO.14/704-4-2, NAKASH, KADAPA, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SADIK ALI KUTAGUL, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O.MOHD HAFIZULLAH KUTAGU, R/O.D.NO.14/704-4-2, NAKASH, KADAPA, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. M/S.ICS TRADING COMPANY, D.NO.3/161, SARVAR KHAN PETA, KHAJIPETM Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MAHABOOB BASHA CHENNUR SHAIK, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. S/O.C.S.ABDUL RASOOL, R/O. D.NO.3/161, SARVAR KHAN PETA, KHAJIPETM Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) A N D 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH, MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT AND COMMISSIONER OF FOOD SAFETY, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, , TO THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MYDUKUR, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , YERRAGUNTLA U/G POLICE STATION, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. SRK, J W.P.No.12660 of 2021 2 8. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BADVEL (URBAN) POLICE STATION, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 9. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PORUMAMILLA POLICE STATION, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 10. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TALUQ POLICE STATION, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 11. SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT BUREAU SEB, KADAPA RANGE, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to take any coercive steps of booking criminal cases based on the notification No.318/FSSA/AP/2014-20, dated 08-01-2020, issued by the first respondent herein in dealing with the products stated therein, which is challenged and stayed in W.P.No.16118/20 and batch, and now the period specified in the said impugned notification which is expired on 8-1-2021, by declaring the action of the respondents in taking coercive steps by way of booking criminal cases based on the notification No.318/FSSA/AP/ 2014-20, dated 08-01-2020 as illegal and arbitrary IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent herein to issue appropriate directions to his subordinates not to initiate any coercive action including booking of criminal cases based on the notification No. 318/FSSA/AP/2014-20, dated 08-01-2020 issued by the Respondent No.1 which is even lapsed, pending writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G RAMACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR MED HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE The Court made the following: SRK, J W.P.No.12660 of 2021 3

O R D E R

This Writ Petition was filed seeking the following relief: “…to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the respondents not to take any coercive steps by booking criminal cases based on the Notification No.318/FSSA/AP/2014-20, dated 08.01.2020 issued by 1st respondent in dealing with the products stated therein, which is challenged and stayed in Writ Petition No.16118 of 2020 and batch, and now the period specified in the said impugned Notification which is expired on 08.01.2021 by declaring the action of respondents in taking coercive steps by way of booking Criminal Cases based on the Notification No.318/FSSA/AP/2014-20, dated 08.01.2020, as illegal and arbitrary and pass such other order or orders …”

2.

It is the case of the Writ Petitioners that they are the registered proprietary firms and registered with GST authority, engaged inter alia in the wholesale and retail distribution of chewing tobacco products and certain non-tobacco products like pan masala, supari, etc. The chewing tobacco products, as far as the Writ Petitioners’ business is concerned, are broadly pure tobacco, flavoured tobacco and scented tobacco. (b) By virtue of Notification No.318/FSSA/AP/2014-20, dated 08.01.2020 issued by respondent No.3 under Section 30 (2) (a) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (for brevity ‘the FSSA, 2006’), banning all chewing tobacco products, the business of Writ Petitioners was declared as illegal and they were forced to suspend their business temporarily for the time being. Aggrieved of the said Notification, the Writ Petitioners filed Writ Petition No.23548 of 2020 before this Court and obtained Stay order. (c) Despite there is clear position of law, 1st respondent, without application of mind, issued impugned Notification. The power conferred on 1st respondent under Section 30 (2) of the FSSA, 2006 is limited and does not empower to ban products covered the FSSA, 2006. The said Notification was impugned in Writ Petition No.16118 of 2020 and batch before this Court and the same are pending. (d) This Court vide Order dated 27.08.2018 in Criminal Petition No.3731 of 2018 and batch, quashed several criminal proceedings initiated against the persons/entities engaged in dealing with tobacco products that are covered in the impugned Notification under the garb of enforcing similar Notifications in the past. Hence, the Writ Petition.

3.

When the matter came up for hearing, it is submitted by learned counsel for the Writ Petitioners and, acceded to, by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department and Commissioner of Food Safety, representing respondent No.1, that the subject matter of the present Writ Petition is squarely covered by the Common Order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.30185 of 2022 and batch, dated 24.03.2023, wherein, it was held as under: (paragraph Nos.34, 35 & 36) “34. In view of the above discussion, the legal position is abundantly clear that the COTPA, 2003 is a special Act specifically dealing with Tobacco and Tobacco products by including Pan Masala or any chewing material having Tobacco as one of its ingredients by whatever name called. The FSSA, 2006 being a general Act, provides that it is an Act to consolidate the laws relating to food and to establish the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India for laying down science based standards for articles of food and to regulate their manufacture, storage, distribution, sale and import, to ensure availability of safe and wholesome food for human consumption and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. Thus, the FSSA, 2006 deals with food as defined under Section 3 (j) of the said Act, whereas Tobacco and Tobacco products are covered under the COPTA, 2003. Since Godawat Pan Masala Products I.P. Ltd.1 still holds the field, Pan Masala or Gutka containing Tobacco, cannot be considered to be “food” and the Commissioner of Food Safety, Andhra Pradesh is neither authorized nor has any juri iction to issue the impugned notification.

35.

Ex Consequenti, it is declared that the Commissioner of Food Safety, Andhra Pradesh is neither authorized nor having any juri iction to issue the impugned notification, prohibiting the manufacture, storage, distribution, transportation and sale of Gutka/Pan Masala which contains Tobacco and Nicotine as ingredients and Chewing Tobacco products, within the meaning of Sections 3 (m) and 3 (p) of the COTPA, 2003, in exercise of powers under Section 30 (2) (a) of the FSSA, 2006. 1 (2004) 7 SCC 68. 36. As a further consequence, the respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful day-to-day business activities of the writ petitioners with regard to Tobacco products.”

4.

In view of the Common Order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.30185 of 2022 and batch dated 24.03.2023 and for the reasons mentioned therein, this Writ Petition also deserves to be allowed.

5.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed, directing the respondents not to interfere with the lawful day-to-day business activities of the Writ Petitioners in regard to tobacco products and not to take coercive action against the Writ Petitioners under the provisions of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006/the Food Safety and Standards Regulation, 2011. There shall be no order as to costs of the Writ Petition. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

___ __________

JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY 30th March, 2026. Note:

Office to attach copy of Common Order in Writ Petition No.30185 of 2022 and batch, Dated 24.03.2023, to this order.

B/o. DNB

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.