Ms Maithili Life Sciences Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner (Central GST)

WP/2274/2026HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01003737202621 April 2026Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,T.C.D.SEKHAR5 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The High Court, relying on a previous Division Bench decision, held that a single composite assessment order cannot be passed for more than one tax period. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh proceedings for each assessment year separately, subject to the petitioner depositing 20% of the disputed tax.

Facts

The petitioner challenged a composite assessment order issued by the Assistant Commissioner Central GST covering multiple financial years (2017-18 to 2021-22), contending it was arbitrary, without jurisdiction, and violated principles of natural justice, specifically pressing the ground that a single order for multiple years is illegal.

Key Issues

Whether a single composite assessment order covering multiple financial years is valid under the GST Act, 2017, or if separate orders are required for each assessment year.

Sections Cited

Section 73, Section 74

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

APHC010037372026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 2274/2026 Between:

1.

MS MAITHILI LIFE SCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED, PLOT NO 2 APIIC, GAJULAMANDYAM VILLAGE, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR-517520. ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT MANAGING DIRECTOR DEVASANI GOPINATH REDDY

...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GST, (CENTRAL GST), TIRUPATHI CGST DIVISION, 15-30/4, PADMAVATHI NAGAR, MAHILA UNIVERSITY ROAD, TIRUPATHI.

2.

THE SUPERINDENT, TIRUPATHI - III, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH. (GST) 517520

3.

THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Order or direction declaring (1) the action of the 1st Resp

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.