Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kakinada (Jntuk) vs. The Princiapl Commissioner Of Central Tax

WP/23535/2023HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01045423202326 April 2026Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,T.C.D.SEKHAR20 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that the universities are not Central/State Government or Local Authorities. It further ruled that the statutory functions of granting affiliations and NOCs do not fall within the definition of 'business' under Section 2(17) and thus do not constitute a 'supply of service' under Section 7 of the GST Act, making them not exigible to tax.

Facts

Public Universities challenged assessment orders demanding GST on affiliation fees and No Objection Certificate (NOC) fees received from their affiliated colleges. They contended that these were statutory functions, not a 'supply of services' in the course of 'business', and were exempt under Notification No. 12 of 2017.

Key Issues

Whether affiliation and NOC fees collected by public universities for statutory functions constitute 'supply of services' in the course of 'business' under the GST Act, and if so, whether they are exempt under Notification No. 12 of 2017.

Sections Cited

Section 7(1), Section 7(2)(b), Section 2(17), Section 2(17)(i), Section 74, Notification No. 12 of 2017 (Entry No. 66)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

W.P.No.23535 of 2023
W.P.9123 of 2026

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

APHC010454232023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR W.P.No.23535, 31934 of 2023, 7867 and 26414 of 2025 and W.P.9123 of 2026

WRIT PETITION NOs: 23535 of 2023 Between:

1.

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY KAKINADA (JNTUK), REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PITHAPURAM ROAD, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT,

ANDHRA PRADESH-533 003

...PETITIONER AND 1. THE PRINCIAPL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM CGST COMMISSIONERATE, GST BHAVAN, PORT AREA, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 035

2.

THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER- OF CENTRAL TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM CGST COMMISSIONERATE, GST BHAVAN, PORT AREA, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 035

3.

THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS REVENUE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, 128- A/NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI ...RESPONDENT(S): Petitio

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.