Vikrama Simhapuri University vs. The Principal Commissioner Of Central Tax

WP/26414/2025HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01051074202526 April 2026Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,T.C.D.SEKHAR20 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that the universities are separate entities, not government or local authorities, making Section 7(2) and Section 2(17)(i) inapplicable. It ruled that granting affiliations and NOCs are statutory functions, not 'business' activities under Section 2(17), and thus do not constitute a 'supply of service' under Section 7 of the GST Act. Consequently, these services are not taxable.

Facts

Public Universities challenged GST demands on affiliation and No Objection Certificate (NOC) fees, contending these were statutory functions, not 'supply of services' in the course of 'business', and were exempt under Notification No. 12/2017. The assessing authorities had rejected these arguments, leading to the writ petitions.

Key Issues

The key legal issues were whether affiliation and NOC fees collected by public universities constitute 'supply of services' in the course of 'business' under Section 7 read with Section 2(17) of the GST Act, and if so, whether they are exempt under Notification No. 12/2017.

Sections Cited

Section 7(1), Section 7(2)(b), Section 2(17)(i), Section 2(17)(a) to (h), Section 74

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

W.P.No.23535 of 2023
W.P.9123 of 2026

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

APHC010454232023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR W.P.No.23535, 31934 of 2023, 7867 and 26414 of 2025 and W.P.9123 of 2026

WRIT PETITION NOs: 23535 of 2023 Between:

1.

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY KAKINADA (JNTUK), REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PITHAPURAM ROAD, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT,

ANDHRA PRADESH-533 003

...PETITIONER AND 1. THE PRINCIAPL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM CGST COMMISSIONERATE, GST BHAVAN, PORT AREA, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 035

2.

THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER- OF CENTRAL TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM CGST COMMISSIONERATE, GST BHAVAN, PORT AREA, VISAKHAPATNAM-530 035

3.

THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS REVENUE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, 128- A/NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI ...RESPONDENT(S): Petitio

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.