Naidu Projects vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner

WP/11154/2026HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01021304202627 April 2026Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,T.C.D.SEKHAR7 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The High Court set aside the assessment order, reiterating that the absence of a DIN invalidates such an order. While acknowledging the delay, the Court considered the practical difficulties faced by taxpayers with the online GST mechanism and remanded the matter for fresh assessment, subject to the petitioner depositing 20% of the disputed tax.

Facts

The petitioner challenged an assessment order and subsequent recovery proceedings, arguing the assessment order lacked a Document Identification Number (DIN), was passed without personal hearing, and was not properly served. The respondent contended delay in filing the petition, asserting service via portal upload was valid under Section 169(1)(d) of the GST Act.

Key Issues

The key issues were the validity of an assessment order lacking a Document Identification Number (DIN) and whether service of an order by portal upload is sufficient, especially when considering delays in challenging such orders.

Sections Cited

Section 169 (1) (d)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

APHC010213042026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 11154/2026 Between:

1.

M/s.NAIDU PROJECTS, HAVING THEIR REGD. PREMISES AT D. NO. 21-70-4, KAKANI NAGAR, AIRPORT NAD JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR. KAMISETTI SRI RAMULU

...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MADHAVADHARA CIRCLE, VISAKHAPATNAM DIVISION - II VISAKHAPATNAM

2.

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE (CT) DEPT., VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI - 522 237

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned Assessment Order passed by the 1st Respondent in FORM GST DRC - 07 Dt. 26.12.2023 for the tax period 2017- 18 without affixing any

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.