M/S. Srk Constructions vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)-Ii

WP/12513/2026HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01023798202605 May 2026Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,T.C.D.SEKHAR6 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court held that an assessment order without the assessing officer's signature is invalid and does not constitute proper service as per Rule 26(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017. Following its own precedents, the Court set aside the impugned order, granting liberty to the respondent to conduct a fresh assessment after giving proper notice and assigning a signature.

Facts

M/s. SRK Constructions challenged an ex-parte summary assessment order in Form GST DRC-07 for the tax period 2021-22, issued by the Deputy Assistant Commissioner. The primary ground for challenge was that the order did not contain the physical or digital signature of the assessing officer.

Key Issues

The key legal issue was the validity of an assessment order issued without the assessing officer's signature and whether such an unsigned order constitutes proper service under the GST Act and Rules.

Sections Cited

Section 160, Section 169, Rule 26(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

APHC010237982026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 12513/2026 Between:

1.

M/S. SRK CONSTRUCTIONS,, 2/6/26/1, NEAR FIRE STATION, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, KIRAN KUMAR PARNAPALLE.

...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER STII, O/O THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST), PULIVENDULA

CIRCLE, KADAPA DIVISION, COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICE, ISLAMPURAM, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

2.

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (CT) DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

3.

THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY (FINANCE), MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110001. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toprayed t

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.