M/S Srk Constructions vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)-Ii

WP/12744/2026HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01023792202605 May 2026Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,T.C.D.SEKHAR6 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court set aside the unsigned assessment order, holding that the absence of the assessing officer's signature renders it invalid. It further ruled that an unsigned order is not considered served under Rule 26(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017, and allowed for a fresh assessment.

Facts

The petitioner challenged an ex-parte assessment order in Form GST DRC-07 for the tax period 2024-25, primarily on the ground that it was unsigned. Other grounds included lack of show cause notice and improper invocation of Section 74.

Key Issues

The key legal issue was the validity of an assessment order lacking the assessing officer's signature. A related issue was whether an unsigned order constitutes valid service and its impact on the delay in challenging the order.

Sections Cited

Section 160, Section 169, Rule 26(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

APHC010237922026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 12744/2026 Between:

1.

M/S SRK CONSTRUCTIONS, 2/6/26/1, NEAR FIRE STATION PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR , KIRAN KURNAR PARNAPALLE.

...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER STII, (ST)-II, O/O THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST), PULIVENDULA

CIRCLE, KADAPA DIVISION, COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICE, ISLAMPURAM, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

2.

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (CT) DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

3.

THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY (FINANCE), MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110001. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tople

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.