M/S. Sri Balaji Traders vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)

WP/19995/2026HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01036686202604 August 2026Bench: NINALA JAYASURYA,T.C.D.SEKHAR6 pages
For Petitioner: G NARENDRA CHETTYFor Respondent: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The High Court held that service of notices and orders via the common portal is a recognized mode under Section 169(1)(d) of the Act. However, considering the practical difficulties faced by assesses, it set aside the assessment order and the appeal rejection, remanding the matter to the 1st respondent for a fresh decision after affording due opportunity, subject to the petitioner depositing 20% of the disputed tax.

Facts

A registered dealer failed to respond to GST notices and an assessment order was passed. Their subsequent appeal was rejected due to a 107-day delay, as the appellate authority lacked power to condone it. The petitioner challenged these, claiming improper service of notices and the order, which were only uploaded on the common portal.

Key Issues

Whether uploading notices and assessment orders on the common portal constitutes valid service under the GST Act, and whether the Court should intervene despite valid service due to practical difficulties faced by taxpayers.

Sections Cited

Section 61, Section 169(1)(b), Section 169(1)(d), Section 161(d)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
APHC010366862026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3543] WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 19995/2026 Between: M/s. Sri Balaji Traders ...PETITIONER AND The Assistant Commissioner St and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G NARENDRA CHETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX 2 NJSJ & TCDS, J WP.No.19995 of 2026

The Court made the following order: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice T.C.D. Sekhar)

The petitioner, a registered dealer under the GST Act, was served with notice in Form GST ASMT-10, under Section 61 of the Act, in relation to the tax period 2023-24. Subsequently, the petitioner was issued intimation notice in Form GST DRC-01A, dated 06.05.2025, and thereafter issued notice in Form GST DRC-01 dated 20.05.2025. The petitioner did not respond to the notices mentioned above. Further, the petitioner was also issued notice dated 20.06.2025, calling upon to attend for personal hearing. Even to this notice, the petitioner did not turn up. I

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.