M/S Medicaid vs. The Additional Commissioner (St) (Fac)

WP/22886/2026HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01041938202607 September 2026Bench: NINALA JAYASURYA,T.C.D.SEKHAR6 pages
For Petitioner: CHATAKONDU L V S CHAITANYA KUMARFor Respondent: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that the consolidated assessment order was unsustainable as it violated principles of natural justice by not considering the petitioner's reply. It further ruled that a single show cause notice or composite assessment order cannot be passed for more than one tax period, citing a co-ordinate bench decision. The impugned orders were set aside, allowing the proper officer to issue separate notices for relevant tax periods and proceed afresh.

Facts

The petitioner challenged a consolidated GST assessment order (DRC-07) issued for multiple tax periods (2019-20 to 2023-24) without considering their reply and lacking a DIN, along with subsequent appeal rejection orders. The assessment order was challenged on grounds of violation of natural justice and being a composite order for several tax periods.

Key Issues

Whether a consolidated GST assessment order covering multiple tax periods is legally sustainable, and whether an assessment order passed without considering the taxpayer's reply violates principles of natural justice.

Sections Cited

Section 73(3), Section 74(3), Section 74(4), Section 128 of APGST Act

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
APHC010419002026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3543] TUESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 22886 & 22887/2026 Between: M/s Medicaid ...PETITIONER AND The Additional Commissioner St Fac and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHATAKONDU L V S CHAITANYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX 2 NJSJ & TCDS, J WP.Nos.22886 & 22887 of 2026

The Court made the following common order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya)

Both these writ petitions arise out of the same issue and relate to the same tax period, they are being disposed of by way of this common order.

2.

Petitioner, is registered under the provisions of the GST Act, 2017, is engaged in the business of Antibiotics – Penicillin and their derivatives. Aggrieved by the Assessment Order passed by the 2nd respondent vide Assessment and Adjudication Order in DRC-07 dated 30.07.2024, in a consolidated manner for the tax periods 2019-20 to 2023-24, without affixing any DIN, and t

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.