M/S D.D Builders Limited, Kalahandi vs. State Of Odisha

WP(C)/24966/2025HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01063569202503 December 2025Bench: MR. JUSTICE HARISH TANDON (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN5 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The Court directed the Chief Construction Engineer to consider the recommendation for price escalation within four weeks. The Court acknowledged the petitioner's difficulty and the conceded position of the authorities.

Facts

The petitioner, a contractor, sought disbursal of an amount relatable to price escalation for a construction project. Despite completing the work within the extended period and receiving recommendations for the escalation amount, the payment was not processed.

Key Issues

The primary issue was the non-disbursal of price escalation amounts to the contractor despite recommendations and relevant circulars. The Court also considered the applicability of government circulars regarding price escalation claims.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.24966 of 2025 M/s. D.D. Builders Limited, Kalahandi … Petitioner Mr. Sidhant Dwibedi, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha and others … Opposite Parties Mr. Debashis Tripathy, Additional Government Advocate CORAM: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Order No.

ORDER 03.12.2025

03.1.

Non-disbursal of amount relatable to price escalation has given rise to the filing of this writ petition invoking provisions of Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

2.

Sri Sidhant Dwibedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, referring to averments made in the writ petition, submitted that the petitioner had been declared lowest successful bidder in the tender for the work namely “Construction of Right Main Extension Canal from RD.2130M to 2610M including structures Lining Works & Service Road” of Upper Indravati Irrigation Project. As per agreement the petitioner was required to commence the work from 26.12.2006 and complete the same by 25.06.2009. 3. However, there was a delay in execution of the work owi

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.