M/S Chandra Traders, Ganjam vs. Commissioner Of State Tax, Commissionerate Of CT And GST Odisha ,Cuttack
Held
The Court condoned the delay in the petitioner's request for revocation of cancellation. The petitioner is directed to deposit all dues and comply with formalities for their application to be considered.
Facts
The petitioner's GST registration was cancelled. The petitioner is willing to pay all outstanding dues, including tax, interest, late fee, and penalty, to have their registration restored.
Key Issues
Whether the delay in seeking revocation of GST registration cancellation should be condoned, and if so, under what conditions.
Sections Cited
Rule 23
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 05.12.2025 01. 1. Mr. S.K. Mishra, learned counsel appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, under challenge is show cause notice dated 24th April, 2024 followed by order dated 8th May, 2024 cancelling his client’s registration under Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. He submits, his client is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid for the return form of his client to be accepted by the department. He relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) no.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others). He submits, his client’s claim to relief including praye
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.