M/S Mahaveer Stone Product vs. Additional Commissioner CT And GST, Bhubaneswar

Original PDF →
WP(C)/3264/2026HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01006712202605 February 2026Bench: MR. JUSTICE HARISH TANDON (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN2 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 3264 of 2026 M/s. Mahaveer Stone Product, Jajpur …. Petitioner Mr. Subhajeet Sahu, Advocate -versus- Additional Commissioner, CGST, Bhubaneswar and another …. Opposite Parties Mr. M. Agarwal, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE MR JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Order No.

ORDER 05.02.2026 01. 1. Leave is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to correct the discrepancies of the opposite parties in Court today.

2.

Mr. Subhajeet Sahu, learned counsel appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, under challenge is show cause notice dated 29th March, 2025 followed by order dated 11th September, 2025 and 16th January, 2026 cancelling his client’s registration under State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. He submits, his client is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid for the return form of his client to be accepted by the department. He relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) no.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others). He submits, his client’s claim to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by said order.

3.

Mr. M. Agarwal, learned Additional Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the opposite parties-Department.

4.

We reproduce below paragraph-2 from said order in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises (supra).

"

2.

In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc., due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner’s application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law."

Likewise direction is made in this writ petition. Petitioner gets the relief in the interest of revenue.

5.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Harish Tandon)

Chief Justice

(M.S. Raman) Judge

S.K. Jena/ Sisira

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.