Diptimayee Das vs. The Superintendent Of CGST And Cx, Bhubaneswar Ii Range

Original PDF →
WP(C)/8480/2026HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01019593202626 March 2026Bench: MR. JUSTICE HARISH TANDON (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN2 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.8480 of 2026 Diptimayee Das … Petitioner Mr. Deba Prasad Mishra, Advocate -Versus- The Superintendent of CGST and CX, Bhubaneswar-II Range … Opposite Parties Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Order No.

ORDER 26.03.2026

01.1.

Learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, under challenge is show cause notice dated 13th May, 2024 followed by order dated 9th October, 2025 cancelling her client’s registration under Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. She submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid for the return form of her client to be accepted by the Department. She relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) No.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others). She submits, her client’s claim to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by said order.

2.

Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, learned Additional Standing Counsel for State Revenue.

3.

We reproduce below paragraph-2 from said order in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises (supra).

"

2.

In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc., due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner’s application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law."

Likewise direction is made in this writ petition. Petitioner gets the relief in the interest of revenue.

4.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Harish Tandon) Chief Justice

(M.S. Raman) Judge

SK Jena/Sr. Secy.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.