M/S. Dhabaleswar Enterprisers, Cuttack vs. Principal Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, Bbsr
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 14.08.2026 Order No.
Today, Mr. D. Patnaik, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the present Writ Petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a better Writ Petition. .
Mr. B.A. Prusty, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Opposite Parties does not object to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner.
Considering the submission of Mr. Patnaik, learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that the prayer is not opposed by Mr. Prusty, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Opposite Parties, the prayer for withdrawal of the Writ Petition is allowed.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a better Writ Petition, if so advised, in accordance with law.
(MANASH RANJAN PATHAK)
Judge
(MURAHARI SRI RAMAN)
Judge
Rati Ranjan
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.