Sabmiller INDIA Limited & Anr. vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.
Held
The Court held that the challenge to the levy of service tax on license fees and application fees for alcoholic liquor for human consumption had been rendered moot. This was based on the undisputed fact that the GST Council, in its 26th meeting, decided that such fees were not leviable to GST/Service Tax. The Central Government subsequently accepted this decision. The Court noted the communication from the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, dated July 31, 2018, which directed field formations to keep show cause notices issued for the levy of Service Tax on these fees for the period April 1, 2016, to June 30, 2017, in abeyance. Consequently, the writ petitions were disposed of in terms of this development, granting relief to the petitioners without a detailed examination of the legality of the original levy.
Facts
The petitioners, Jagatjit Industries Limited and Sabmiller India Limited, filed writ petitions challenging the levy of service tax on license fees paid for liquor licenses. The petitions were filed before the GST regime came into effect. During the pendency of these proceedings, the GST Council, in its 26th meeting on March 10, 2018, decided that GST/Service Tax could not be levied on license fees and application fees for alcoholic liquor for human consumption. The Central Government accepted this decision on July 31, 2018. A communication from the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, to the Joint Commissioner (Legal), GST Delhi East, confirmed this decision and directed that show cause notices issued for the levy of Service Tax on such fees for the period April 1, 2016, to June 30, 2017, be kept in abeyance.
Key Issues
1. Whether the levy of service tax on license fee and application fee for alcoholic liquor for human consumption is legally sustainable, considering the subsequent decision of the GST Council and acceptance by the Central Government? (Question of law) Petitioner's contention: The petitioners argued that the challenge to the levy of service tax on license fees has become moot due to the GST Council's decision and the Central Government's acceptance, rendering the impugned demand unsustainable. They relied on the communication from the Ministry of Finance as evidence of this change in policy. Revenue's contention: The respondents (Union of India and others) did not present any arguments against the petitioners' claim. Their counsel acknowledged the GST Council's decision and the Central Government's acceptance, indicating that the issue was resolved by these developments.
Sections Cited
None
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
%
2018
It is pointed to the Court by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents that pursuant to previous orders during the pendency of the present proceedings, the GST Council by its 26th mee
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.