Harvinder Singh Bhasin & Ors vs. M/S Jammu & Kashmir Bank Limited

CS(OS)/67/2016HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01028151201606 September 2018Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA2 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court held that in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the plaintiffs and the settlement arrived at between the parties, the plaintiffs were granted liberty to unconditionally withdraw the suit. The settlement terms, including the payment of ₹4,19,46,250/- (less TDS), continuation of business operations for four months at ₹14,00,700/- plus GST per month, and the defendant's agreement to pay interest at 10% per annum on the evaluated rent and 50% of the applicable GST service tax, were acknowledged. The Court directed that the settlement be filed on record and that the court fee be refunded as per law. The suit was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

Facts

The plaintiffs, Harvinder Singh Bhasin & Ors., filed a suit (CS(OS) 67/2016) against the defendant, M/s Jammu & Kashmir Bank Limited. The parties have amicably settled the matter. As per a letter dated September 5, 2018, from the defendant bank, a payment of ₹4,19,46,250/- will be made after deducting TDS. The business operations are to continue from the premises for four months from July 27, 2018, at a monthly rate of ₹14,00,700/- plus GST. The defendant bank agreed to pay interest at 10% per annum on the evaluated rent amount and 50% of the applicable GST service tax. The settled amount is included in the ₹4,19,46,250/-, which the defendant will pay within two days.

Key Issues

1. Whether the suit can be dismissed as withdrawn based on the amicable settlement reached between the parties, including the terms of payment and continuation of business operations. Contentions: Petitioner/Plaintiffs: Submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and sought liberty to unconditionally withdraw the suit. Revenue/State: No arguments recorded for the revenue or state as this is a civil suit between private parties concerning a settlement, not a dispute involving tax authorities under GST law.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 67/2016, IA Nos.7829/2017, 5420/2018 HARVINDER SINGH BHASIN & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Ashish Kumar and Ms.Anubha Dhulia, Advs. versus M/S JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LIMITED ..... Defendant Through Ms.Kanika Agnihotri, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA

O R D E R %

06.09.

2018 IA No.5421/2018 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CS(OS) 67/2016, IA Nos.7829/2017, 5420/2018

The learned counsel for the plaintiff says since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties so the plaintiffs intend to withdraw the suit. As per the settlement so recorded in the letter dated 5th September, 2018 of the Jammu and Kashmir Bank, the bank shall be making payment of 4,19,46,250/- as per the annexure attached, of course, after deducting the TDS at the applicable rate. As agreed, the business operations shall continue from the said premises for a period of four months w.e.f. 27.07.2018 at the monthly rate of 14,00,700/- plus GST.

Learned counsel for the defendant says the bank shall be

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.