Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. Punjab Stainless Steel Industries & Ors.

CEAC/17/2018HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01136606201806 September 2018Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA1 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Sanding Counsel with Mr. Abhishek ghai and Mr. Rajat Gava, AdvsFor Respondent: Mr. Praveena Gautam, Ms. Sreya Dahiya and Ms. Reena Asthana Khair, Advs
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's submission that the tax effect of Rs. 20,95,606/- was below the threshold limit prescribed by the instructions dated July 11, 2018. The Court took on record the instructions issued by the Commissioner, Central GST dated August 14, 2018, which supported the withdrawal of appeals with low tax effect. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for low tax effect. The ratio decidendi is that appeals with a tax effect below the stipulated threshold, as per departmental instructions, are to be withdrawn and dismissed.

Facts

The Commissioner of Central Tax, the petitioner, filed an appeal before the High Court of Delhi. The respondents are Punjab Stainless Steel Industries & Ors. The appeal concerned a tax effect of Rs. 20,95,606/-. The petitioner's counsel submitted instructions to withdraw the appeal, citing the tax effect being below the threshold limit imposed by instructions dated July 11, 2018. A copy of instructions issued by the Commissioner, Central GST dated August 14, 2018, was placed on record.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appeal should be withdrawn and dismissed due to the tax effect being below the prescribed threshold limit, as per the instructions dated July 11, 2018, and August 14, 2018? Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued that the tax effect of Rs. 20,95,606/- is below the threshold limit stipulated by the instructions dated July 11, 2018, and therefore, the appeal should be withdrawn. The petitioner relied on the instructions issued by the Commissioner, Central GST dated August 14, 2018, which presumably provide for such withdrawal. Respondents' Contention: No arguments were recorded for the respondents.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CEAC 17/2018 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Sanding Counsel with Mr. Abhishek ghai and Mr. Rajat Gava, Advs. versus PUNJAB STAINLESS STEEL INDUSTRIES & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Praveena Gautam, Ms. Sreya Dahiya and Ms. Reena Asthana Khair, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

O R D E R %

06.09.

2018

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the appeal since the tax effect is Rs.20,95,606/- as against the threshold limit imposed by certain instructions dated 11.07.2018. Learned counsel has produced a copy of the instructions issued by the Commissioner, Central GST dated 14.08.2018. Same is taken on record.

The appeal is dismissed for low tax effect.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J

A. K. CHAWLA, J SEPTEMBER 06, 2018/rc

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.