M/S Napin Impex Private LTD. vs. Commissioner Of Dgst, Delhi & Ors.

W.P.(C)/10287/2018HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01322688201828 September 2018Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA6 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Surendra Kumar and Mr. A.K. Babbar, AdvsFor Respondent: Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC, GNCTD
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that the indefinite sealing of the business premises by the authorities, even for the purpose of securing evidence, is illegal. The premises were ordered to be de-sealed immediately.

Facts

The petitioner's business premises were sealed by DGST officials under Section 67 of the CGST Act, 2017, for alleged non-cooperation in providing books of accounts. The petitioner contends that the indefinite sealing of the premises is illegal.

Key Issues

Whether the indefinite sealing of business premises under Section 67 of the CGST Act, 2017, is a legal exercise of power by the authorities.

Sections Cited

Section 67

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10287/2018 M/S NAPIN IMPEX PRIVATE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Surendra Kumar and Mr. A.K. Babbar, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF DGST, DELHI & ORS... Respondents Through : Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC, GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

O R D E R %

28.09.

2018

Issue notice to the respondents.

Mr. Gautam Narayan, Additional Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

The petitioner’s grievance is that the sealing of its business premises on behalf of the Delhi Goods and Services Tax (DGST), ostensibly under Section 67 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, is illegal.

The brief facts are that the petitioner is a registered dealer, which trades inter alia in PVC raisins and other food items such as beverages. The petitioner alleges that its premises were visited by the Revenue authorities on 29.08.2018 when the DGST officials directed production of books of accounts and other documents. Since the petitioner was not in possession of those, it sought 24 hours time for W

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.