M/S Riga Sugar Company LTD.Di vs. The Commissioner Of Central Ex

CWJC/2556/2005HC PatnaGSTCNR BRHC01053341200506 October 2018Bench: THE CHIEF JUSTICE,MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD2 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court held that the present petition stands disposed of. This decision was based on the untraceable status of the original papers and the absence of any action from the petitioner or their counsel to pursue the matter over a significant period. The Court inferred a lack of interest or a prior disposal of the main proceedings. However, to provide a remedy in case the matter is still alive, the Court granted liberty to the original writ applicant. They can move an appropriate application by filing a writ petition along with a xerox copy of the entire petition, enabling the reconstruction of the main petition. This liberty is granted to ensure that the case is not dismissed due to procedural technicalities if the petitioner genuinely wishes to pursue it.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Riga Sugar Company Ltd., filed a writ petition (Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2556 of 2005) before the Patna High Court. The respondent was the Commissioner of Central Excise. The case was placed on the Board by the Registry due to the original papers being untraceable. The matter was noted as very old, and neither the advocates nor the parties had approached the Court for a hearing. This led the Court to infer that the main proceedings might have been disposed of or that the parties had lost interest.

Key Issues

1. Whether the writ petition should be disposed of due to the untraceable original papers and lack of pursuit by the parties, as per Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (implied by the Court's inherent powers). The petitioner's side (impliedly) would argue for the continuation of the matter if it is still alive and papers can be reconstructed. The respondent's side (impliedly) would likely agree to disposal if the petitioner shows no interest or if the matter is indeed disposed of. The Court did not record specific arguments from either side, but the issue arose from the procedural situation.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2556 of 2005 ====================================================== M/S RIGA SUGAR COMPANY LTD.(DI ... ... Petitioner/s Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EX ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Pd., Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Tripathy , (Sr. SC. GST and Central Excise) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD

ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 06-10-2018 Present petition is placed on Board by the Registry on the note that the original papers are not traceable. Matter is very old. None of the advocate/parties have approached this Court for hearing. Therefore, it appears that either the main proceedings are disposed of or the parties have no interest.

Under the circumstances, the present petition stands disposed of with the liberty that, in case the original writ applicant is of the opinion that the matter is alive and the advocate for the petitio

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Patna High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.