Commissioner Of Central GST And Central Excise , J And K vs. Hardcastle Petrofer PVT. LTD.

MCC/308/2018HC Jammu and Kashmir and LadakhGSTCNR JKHC02009901201828 November 2018Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN2 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The Court directed that notice be issued to the respondent for February 20, 2019, to show cause as to why the appeal should not be admitted to hearing. In the interim, the Court ordered that subject to the appellant releasing 50% of the amount due in terms of the impugned CESTAT judgment dated March 23, 2018, to the respondent entrepreneur, upon furnishing solvent surety to the satisfaction of the Jurisdictional Commissioner within four weeks of furnishing such surety, the payment of the balance amount shall remain stayed. The appeal was listed along with CEA 09/2018.

Facts

The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K, Jammu (appellant) filed an appeal before the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir against an order dated March 23, 2018, passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The appeal concerns multiple appeal numbers before the CESTAT, including E/51135/2015-E/51138/2015, E/51140/2015-E/51142/2015, and others. The appellant sought to dispense with the filing of a certified copy of the impugned order. The High Court issued notice to the respondent, Hardcastle Petrofer Pvt. Ltd., for February 20, 2019, to show cause why the appeal should not be admitted to hearing. Interim directions were also issued.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K, Jammu, against the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated March 23, 2018, should be admitted to hearing. Contentions: Petitioner/Appellant (Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K, Jammu): Relied on an earlier order passed by the High Court in CEA No. 09/2018, where notice had been issued and interim directions granted, to support the admission of this appeal. Respondent (Hardcastle Petrofer Pvt. Ltd.): No arguments recorded for the respondent at this stage.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

__________________________________________________________________________________ MCC No. 308/2018 Regular list Item No.12 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU

MCC No. 308/2018 c/w CEA No. 54/2018, IA No. 01/2018

Date of order: 28.11.2018 Commissioner of Central GST and Central; Excise, J&K, Jammu Vs. Hardcastle Petrofer Pvt. Ltd. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE Appearing counsel(s): For Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate For respondent (s) :

MCC NO. 308/2018

For the reasons stated in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. Accordingly, filing of the certified copy of the impugned order is dispensed with. CEA No. 54/2018 Learned counsel for the appellant places reliance on an earlier order passed by this Court in CEA No. 09/2018, in which notice has been

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.