Comnr.Cen.Excise vs. East INDIA Steels P.

OTAPL/20/2006HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01002947200612 December 2018Bench: MR. JUSTICE K. S. JHAVERI (CJ),MR. JUSTICE K.R.MOHAPATRA3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court noted that the tax effect in the instant appeal was less than Rs. 50 lakh, which fell below the monetary limit of Rs. 50,00,000/- for filing appeals before the High Court, as stipulated in the CBIC Circular dated July 11, 2018. In view of this Circular, which aimed at reducing government litigation by raising monetary limits for appeals, the Court disposed of the appeal. The reasoning was based on the directive issued by the CBIC to not file appeals below the specified monetary thresholds. The ratio decidendi is that appeals filed by the Department that do not meet the revised monetary limits prescribed by the CBIC Circulars are to be disposed of in accordance with the Circular's intent to reduce litigation. The Court granted liberty to the appellant (Department) to revive the appeal in case of difficulty, implying that if circumstances changed or if the Circular was interpreted differently in the future, the appeal could be re-examined.

Facts

The appeal was filed by the Department against an order dated March 28, 2006, passed by the CESTAT, Kolkata. The tax effect in dispute was stated to be less than Rs. 50 lakh. The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) issued a Circular on July 11, 2018, in exercise of its powers under Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944, which was made applicable to Service Tax vide Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. This circular raised the monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department before the CESTAT, High Courts, and Supreme Court. The revised monetary limit for filing appeals before the High Court was Rs. 50,00,000/-.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appeal filed by the Department is maintainable before the High Court given the monetary limit stipulated in the Circular dated July 11, 2018, issued by the CBIC? The Department, represented by learned Senior Standing Counsel, did not explicitly argue on the merits of the case. However, the appeal was before the High Court, and the tax effect was less than Rs. 50 lakh. The Department's primary concern would be the applicability and interpretation of the CBIC Circular. The Court was implicitly considering whether the Circular mandated the withdrawal or non-filing of appeals below the specified monetary threshold. The Revenue (Department) relied on the Circular dated July 11, 2018, which established a monetary limit of Rs. 50,00,000/- for filing appeals before the High Court. The Circular also stated that it applied to pending cases and that withdrawal processes would follow existing practices.

Sections Cited

Section 35R, Section 83

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

04.

12.12.2018

Heard learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Department.

Instant appeal is directed against order dated 28.03.2006 passed by CESTAT, Kolkata in Order No.M- 139/A-192/KOL/2006 and indisputably the tax effect as brought to our notice, is less than Rs.50 lac.

A Circular dated 11.07.2018 has been issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs in exercise of its power under Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944 which reads as under:-

F. No.390/Misc.116/2017-JC

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue

Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs

(Judicial Cell)

‘B’ Wing , 4th Floor, HUDCO-VISHALA Building Bhikaji Cama Place, R.K. Puram, New Delhi-66

Dated 11.07.2018 INSTRUCTION

To 1. All principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners/Principal Commissioners/Commissioners of Customs/Customs (Preventive) GST & CX;

2.

All Principal Director Generals/Director Generals of Customs, GST & CX.

3.

Chief Commissioner (AR); Commissioner Directorate of Legal Affairs, CBIC; 4. <webmaster.cbec@cegale.gov.in> OTAPL No.20 of 2006

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.