Hughes & Hughes Chem. LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.

W.P.(C)/8281/2017HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01422136201725 October 2017Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Amit Khemka, Mr. Rishi Sehgal & Ms. Aditi Kharpate, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC for respondent No. 1. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel for respondent No. 2
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court did not express any opinion on the merits of the case concerning the applicability of Serial No. 79 or Serial No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) to the petitioner's case. The Court noted that these aspects were matters of debate and would be issues to be decided by the concerned authorities. Regarding the petitioner's query about the code number for availing exemption under Serial No. 3, the Court advised the petitioner to first consult a specialist and, if unable to obtain the code, to correspond with the respondent Council. The Court accepted the petitioner's statement that the writ petition could be treated as disposed of in light of the communication received from the authorities disposing of their representation. The Court clarified that no opinion was expressed in favour of any party.

Facts

The petitioner, Hughes & Hughes Chem. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an action or order by the revenue authorities. The petitioner had made a representation seeking an exemption under GST. The revenue authorities, through a communication dated October 12, 2017, informed the petitioner that the exemption cited at Serial No. 79 of a notification did not appear applicable to their case based on the facts presented. The petitioner then stated that they are covered by exemption under Serial No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax(Rate) and sought to withdraw the writ petition, as their representation had been disposed of. The Court was informed that the petitioner was seeking information regarding a code number for availing the exemption under Serial No. 3.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is covered by exemption under Serial No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)? 2. Whether the petitioner is entitled to a specific code number for availing the exemption under Serial No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)? Petitioner's arguments: The petitioner contended that they are covered by exemption under Serial No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). They also raised a query regarding the applicable code number for availing this exemption. The petitioner ultimately stated that in view of the disposal of their representation, the writ petition could be treated as disposed of. Revenue's arguments: The revenue authorities, through their communication dated October 12, 2017, stated that the exemption cited by the petitioner at Serial No. 79 did not seem applicable to their case based on the disclosed facts. They did not explicitly argue on the applicability of Serial No. 3 or the code number in the present proceedings.

Sections Cited

Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax(Rate)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~13. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8281/2017 HUGHES & HUGHES CHEM. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Amit Khemka, Mr. Rishi Sehgal & Ms. Aditi Kharpate, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC for respondent No. 1. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel for respondent No. 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

O R D E R %

25.10.

2017

CM No. 38021/2017 This is an application for recall of the direction in order dated 9th October, 2017 whereby the Secretary of the GST Council was asked to remain present in the Court on 6th November, 2017. 2. Counsel for the petitioner-non applicant states that the petitioner has received communication dated 12th October, 2017, which disposes of the representation made by the petitioner. He states that in view of the said letter, the writ petition can be treated as disposed of.

3.

The said communication in paragraph 5 records that the exemption cited by the petitioner at Serial No. 79 does not seem to be applicable to the petitioner’s case,

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.