Mirik Health Foods PVT LTD vs. State Of Raj And Ors

CW/4608/2017HC RajasthanGSTCNR RJHC02021454201726 October 2017Bench: K. S. JHAVERI1 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court held that the petitioners' request to withdraw the writ petition be granted. The reasoning was based on the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, stating that the enforcement of GST necessitated the withdrawal. The Court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to the petitioners to apply for registration under the GST as per law. No specific provisions of the GST Act were discussed or relied upon for this decision. No issues were expressly left undecided.

Facts

The petitioners, Mirik Health Foods (P) Ltd. and its authorized signatory Pawan Sharma, filed a writ petition before the Rajasthan High Court. The petition was filed against the State of Rajasthan and its Commercial Taxes Department authorities. The specific tax period and the order or action under challenge are not detailed in the judgment. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned. The procedural history leading to the writ petition is not recorded.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioners should be permitted to withdraw their writ petition due to the enforcement of GST? The petitioners argued that due to the enforcement of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), they should be allowed to withdraw their writ petition. They sought liberty to apply for registration under the GST in accordance with the law. The respondents' arguments are not recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4608 / 2017

1.

Mirik Health Foods (P) Ltd., Correspondence Address At 105, I Floor, New Delhi House, 27, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-1 Through Authorised Signatory Pawan Sharma.

2.

Pawan Sharma Son of Late Shri Sudesh Kumar Sharma, General Manager (Operations) Mirik Health Foods (P) Ltd., Aged About 50 Years, Correspondence Address At 105, I Floor, New Delhi House, 27, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-1. ----Petitioners Versus

1.

State of Rajasthan Through Its Principal Secretary, Commercial Taxes Department, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).

2.

Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, Bikaner (Raj.).

3.

Commercial Taxes Officer, Commercial Taxes Department, Shahpura, District- Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Yadav For Respondent(s) :

_____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.BHANDARI Order 26/10/2017

Learned coun

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.