M/S Jnr Recycling vs. Principal Commissiner CGST & Ors.

W.P.(C)/13350/2026HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01043285202615 September 2026Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL3 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Praveen Kardam, Mr. Manish Kumar and Ms. Radhika Dhingra, AdvsFor Respondent: None
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The High Court declined to intervene, relegating the petitioner to the alternative remedy of appeal. It noted that the petitioner's representative had participated in proceedings and his statement was recorded, and the issue of SCN could be examined by the Appellate Authority.

Facts

M/s JNR Recycling challenged a GST DRC-07 and Order-in-Original for FY 2019-2020, alleging no proper Show Cause Notice was issued. The department found the petitioner's premises residential, no commercial activity, no actual supply of scrap, and availed ITC without corresponding goods, leading to GST registration cancellation.

Key Issues

Whether the GST proceedings were vitiated due to the alleged non-issuance of a Show Cause Notice, and if the High Court should exercise its writ jurisdiction bypassing the statutory appellate remedy.

Sections Cited

Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010432852026 + W.P.(C) 13350/2026, CM APPL. 62153/2026 and CM APPL. 62154/2026 M/S JNR RECYCLING .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Praveen Kardam, Mr. Manish Kumar and Ms. Radhika Dhingra, Advs. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER CGST & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN

O R D E R % 15.09.2026

1.

Through the present Petition, the Petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, to quash/set aside the Form GST DRC-07-Bearing reference No. ZD070326055896X dated 26.03.2026 w.r.t. F.Y. 2019-2020, along with the consequential Order-in-Original dated 26.03.2026 and all proceedings arising therefrom. In addition, the Petitioner, inter alia, also seek directions to the Respondents to issue a proper and specific Show Cause Notice (SCN).

2.

Notably, the Petitioner failed to file a copy of the Impugned OIO, along with the present Petition. However, upon a request made by this Court, learned counsel representing the Petitioner, has produced a copy of the Impugned OIO during the course of his arguments. This is a digitally signed order. The authentic

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.