M/S Ushodaya Lorry Transport v. Union Of INDIA

Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Case number
WP/20268/2025
Date of judgment
15 Sept 2026
Bench
NINALA JAYASURYA,T.C.D.SEKHAR
Petitioner
M/S USHODAYA LORRY TRANSPORT
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
CNR
APHC010397672025

Judgment

APHC010397672025

IN THE H ( WEDNESDAY, THE HON’BLE THE HON’B WRIT Between:

1. M/S USHODAYA LO OFFICE AT D.No. 54 VIJAYAWADA, KRISH REPRESENTED BY VENKATA RAMA RAJ

1. UNION OF INDIA, FINANCE, DEPARTM SANSAD MARG, NEW 2. DIRECTORATE GE THROUGH DIRECTO NUMBER 06, WEST 110066 PRDG.DGGIH 3. DIRECTORATE G VISHAKAPATNAM ZO DIRECTOR, D.NO THEATRE, VISHAKA 4. THE ADDITIONAL GENERAL OF GST ZONAL UNIT, DO MELODY THEATRE, 5. THE DEPUTY / ASS DIVISION, D.NO. 55 CGO COMPLEX, RO VIJAYAWADA - 52000

1 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT E SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

PETITION No: 20268 of 2025 ORRY TRANSPORT, HAVING ITS RE 4-2-4B, 4TH CROSS, 3RD ROAD, AU HNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH Y ITS MANAGING PARTNER,

JU.

...P AND THROUGH SECRETARY, MINIS MENT OF REVENUE JEEVAN DEEP B W DELHI-110001.

ENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE OR GENERAL 1ST AND 2ND FLOO T BLOCK, 08 RK PURAM, NEW DEL HQRS@GOV.IN.

GENERAL OF GST INTEL ONAL UNIT REPRESENTED BY ITS O.28-14-17, SURYABAGH, BESIDE APATNAM - 530020 DGGI-VRU@GOV.I ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIREC INTELLIGENCE (DGGI), VISAKHA OR NO. 28-14-17, SURYA BAGH, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530020.

ISTANT COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWA 5-17-3, C-14 AND PC-1, 3RD FLOO OAD NO.2, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, AUTO 07.

...RESPON

[3543] EGISTERED TO NAGAR, H - 520007.

PONAMALA PETITIONER STRY OF BUILDING, E DGGI, OR, WING HI, DELHI LIGENCE, S DEPUTY MELODY N.

CTORATE APATNAM BESIDE ADA COST OR, NEAR O NAGAR, NDENT(S):

2

Counsel for the Petitioner:

Ms.JYOTHI RATNA ANUMOLU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.Smt.SANTHI CHANDRA 2.SANTHI CHANDRA(Sr.STANDING COUNSEL FOR DRI AND DGGI)

3

The Court made the following order: (Per NJS, J) It is represented by Mr.P.Lalith Ram, learned counsel representing the counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.

Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, all pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

_____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date: 16.09.2026 BLV

4

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

W.P.No.20268 of 2025 Dt: 16.09.2026

BLV

5

Original PDF on the eCourts judgment service →

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.