Sri. Saroj Kumar Pandey vs. State Of Telangana

CRLP/13710/2026HC TelanganaGSTCNR HBHC01057277202617 September 2026Bench: N.TUKARAMJI23 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court allowed the anticipatory bail application, noting the petitioner's cooperation, the documentary nature of the evidence already seized, and the fact that the co-accused had been granted bail. It granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions including surrender, furnishing bonds, regular appearance before the Investigating Officer, and cooperation, while clarifying that the order does not restrict further action under Sections 69 and 132 of the Act.

Facts

The petitioner, a Director of M/s. Shah Batteries Private Limited, was accused of wrongfully availing Input Tax Credit of approximately Rs.98.47 Crores using invoices from non-genuine suppliers, constituting offences under Section 132(1)(c) of the CGST Act and 132(1)(i) of the TGST Act. Searches were conducted, documents seized, and the company deposited Rs.1.50 Crores under protest. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, apprehending arrest, noting his cooperation and that a co-Director had already been granted bail.

Key Issues

Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to a Director accused of fraudulent Input Tax Credit availment under GST laws, considering factors like cooperation, availability of documentary evidence, and the grant of bail to a co-accused.

Sections Cited

Section 69, Section 132(1)(c), Section 132(1)(i)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL PETITION No. 13710 OF 2026 (CNR No. HBHC010572772026) DATE: 17.09.2026 Between : Sri Saroj Kumar Pandey … Petitioner/Accused AND State of Telangana, Through the Public Prosecutor, Commercial Taxes Department, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. … Respondent.

ORDER

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “BNSS”), seeking the relief of anticipatory bail.

2.

The petitioner is arrayed as Accused No. 2 in connection with Ref. No. CCT’s Enft/JE1/05/2026 of Commercial Taxes Department, Telangana State, for the offence under Section 132(1)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, “CGST Act”) and 132(1)(i) of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, “TGST Act”).

2 NTR,J Crl.P. No. 13710 of 2026

3.

Heard Mr. A.V.A. Siva K

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.