M/S Priyadarsini Mahakhud, Angul vs. The Chief Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, Odisha, Cuttack
Held
The Court directed the petitioner to pay all outstanding dues within two weeks. Upon such payment, the Opposite Party was ordered to consider the application for revocation of the registration certificate within six weeks, effectively condoning the delay in invoking Rule 23.
Facts
The petitioner challenged the cancellation of its GST registration certificate and expressed willingness to pay all outstanding tax, interest, late fee, and penalty. It sought relief based on a previous coordinate bench order that condoned delay in invoking Rule 23 for revocation.
Key Issues
Whether the cancellation of GST registration should be revoked upon the petitioner's willingness to pay all outstanding dues, and whether the delay in applying for revocation should be condoned.
Sections Cited
Rule 23
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 19.09.2026
This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
Heard.
Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that the show cause notice dated 14.08.2025 followed by the order of cancellation dated 23.10.2025 cancelling the registration certificate of the Petitioner is under challenge. He submits that the Petitioner is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.