M/S Manoj Kumar Sethy, Ganjam v. The Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, Cuttack

Court
Orissa High Court
Case number
WP(C)/30212/2026
Date of judgment
19 Sept 2026
Bench
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI,MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Petitioner
M/S MANOJ KUMAR SETHY, GANJAM
Respondent
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER, CT AND GST, ODISHA, CUTTACK
CNR
ODHC010723462026

Judgment

Page 1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.30212 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010723462026 M/s. Manoj Kumar Sethy ….

Petitioner(s) Mr. Gourav Kumar Roy Choudhury, Adv.

versus- The Chief Commissioner, CT & GST, Cuttack & Anr.

….

Opposite Party(s) Mr. Sunil Mishra, Standing Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Order No.

01.

ORDER 19.09.2026

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2.

Heard.

3.

Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that the show cause notice dated 02.07.2025 followed by the order of cancellation dated 13.09.2025 cancelling the registration certificate of the Petitioner is under challenge. He submits that the Petitioner is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid along with the return.

He relies on the order dated 16th November, 2022 of a Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 21-Sep-2026 16:18:49 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 3 coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) No.30374 of 2022 (M/s.

Mohanty Enterprises Vrs. The Commissioner, C.T & G.S.T, Odisha, Cuttack and Ors.), wherein it has been observed as follows:- “2. In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc., due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner’s application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law.” 4.

He submits that the claim of the Petitioner to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by the said order.

5.

Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Department-Opposite Party(s) upon perusal of the said order, conceded that in the event the Petitioner complies with the requirement and deposits the amount as undertaken, the authority concerned shall do the needful.

6.

In view of the conceded position, the Petitioner shall make payments as undertaken within a period of two weeks hence and on such eventuality, the Opposite Party shall consider the application for revocation of cancellation of the registration certificate within a period not later than six weeks from today.

Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 21-Sep-2026 16:18:49 Signature Not Verified

Page 3 of 3 7.

In view of the aforesaid observation, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

(Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge

(Murahari Sri Raman) Judge

Ayaskanta Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 21-Sep-2026 16:18:49 Signature Not Verified

Original PDF on the eCourts judgment service →

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.