M/S. Girish Enterprises vs. Supdt. CT And GST, Central Excise, Rourkela Ii Range

WP(C)/27235/2021HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01058680202113 September 2021Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Girish Enterprises, filed a writ petition before the Orissa High Court seeking a direction to the Opposite Parties, the Superintendent and Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, GST & Central Excise, Rourkela, to dispose of their refund application in a time-bound manner. The petition was filed on September 13, 2021. The Opposite Parties, represented by Mr. R.S. Chimanka, accepted notice. The Court did not express any view on the merits of the refund application itself.

Held

The Court, without expressing any view on the merits of the refund application, directed the Assistant Commissioner, GST & Central Excise, Rourkela-I Division, to examine the petitioner's refund application (Annexure-3). The Assistant Commissioner was further directed to provide an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a reasoned order not later than December 13, 2021. The reasoned order was to be communicated to the petitioner not later than December 20, 2021. The Court also noted that if the petitioner was aggrieved by the order passed, they could seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law. The writ petition was disposed of in terms of these directions.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Court should direct the Opposite Parties to dispose of the Petitioner's refund application in a time-bound manner, without prejudice to the merits of the application. Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner sought a direction for the timely disposal of their refund application. Revenue's Contention: The revenue accepted notice and did not appear to contest the limited prayer made by the petitioner.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.27235 of 2021 M/s.Girish Enterprises …. Petitioner Mr. S. Udgata, Advocate -versus- Superintendent, Central Tax, GST & Central Excise, Rourkela-II Range, Rourkela and another …. Opposite Parties Mr. R.S. Chimanka, Senior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER 13.09.2021 Order No.

02.

1. Issue notice.

2.

Mr.R.S. Chimanka, learned Senior Standing Counsel for I.T. accepts notice on behalf of Opposite Parties.

3.

The limited prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the Opposite Parties to dispose of the Petitioner’s refund application in a time bound manner.

4.

Giving to the limited prayer and without expressing any view on merits, the Court directs that the Petitioner’s refund application (Annexure-3) shall be examined by the Assistant Commissioner, GST & Central Excise, Rourkela-I Division, Rourkela (Opposite Party No.2) and after giving an opportunity

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.