M/S Lapp INDIA PVT. LTD. vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs Ministry Of Finance

WP/6971/2024HC Madhya PradeshGST25 September 2024Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL2 pages
For Petitioner: Ayush GuptaFor Respondent: Abhijeet Shrivastava
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court allowed the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the writ petition. The Court held that the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty granted to the petitioner. Specifically, the Court directed that if the petitioner files an appeal within seven days from the date of the order, the appellate authority shall consider the appeal within the period of limitation. This implies that the time spent in the writ proceedings will be considered for condoning any potential delay in filing the appeal. No specific issues regarding the merits of the GST matter were decided as the petition was withdrawn.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Lapp India Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Madhya Pradesh High Court against the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs and others. The petitioner's counsel, after arguing at length, sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The prayer was to allow the petitioner to file an appeal under the Goods and Services Tax Act and Rules, and to direct the respondents to consider this appeal after condoning any delay that occurred due to the petitioner pursuing the writ petition. The counsel for the respondents did not oppose this prayer.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition to file an appeal under the Goods and Services Tax Act and Rules? 2. Whether the appellate authority should be directed to condone the delay in filing the appeal, considering the time spent by the petitioner in pursuing the writ petition? Petitioner's arguments: The petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal under the GST Act and Rules. They contended that since the writ petition was filed within the prescribed limitation period, the respondents should be directed to consider the appeal after condoning the delay incurred while pursuing the writ. Revenue's arguments: The revenue did not oppose the petitioner's prayer for withdrawal and for directions regarding the appeal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEVNARAYAN MISHRA ON THE 25th OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 6971 of 2024 M/S LAPP INDIA PVT. LTD. Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND OTHERS Appearance: Shri Sumit Nema - Senior Advocate with Shri Ayush Gupta - Advocate for petitioner. Shri Abhijeet Shrivastava - Advocate for respondents (through video conferencing).

ORDER Per: Justice Vivek Agarwal After arguing at length, learned Senior counsel for petitioner prays for withdrawal of this writ petition with liberty to file appeal as is provided under the Goods and Services Tax Act and Rules.

He prays that since the writ petition was filed within the prescribed period of limitation, respondents authorities be directed to consider the appeal after condoning the period of delay, which has been spent by the petitioner in pursuing this writ petition.

Prayer is not opposed by Shri Abhijeet Shrivastava, learned counsel 1 WP-6971-2024 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2024:MPHC-JBP:49393 (

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.