Ranvir Kumar Karan vs. Union Of INDIA

WP/15044/2017HC Madhya PradeshGST14 December 2022Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE4 pages
For Petitioner: Sudesh Kumar Mishra
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court dismissed the writ petition. The primary reason for dismissal was the reliance on the Supreme Court's judgment in Civil Appeal No.10177 of 2018, wherein the validity of the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017, was upheld. The Court found that the issues raised by the petitioners regarding the validity of the Act and its applicability to pre-GST stock were already decided by the Supreme Court. Therefore, in light of the Supreme Court's affirmation of the Act's validity, the present petition was dismissed. The Court did not independently analyze the constitutional validity of the provisions but rather applied the precedent set by the apex court. The issue of the petitioners' counsel's repeated absence was also noted.

Facts

The petitioners, various coal traders and companies, filed a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 8 of the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017, and the Goods and Services Tax Compensation Rules, 2017, along with Notification No.1/2017-Compensation Cess (Rate), dated June 28, 2017. They sought to declare these provisions unconstitutional and ultra vires, arguing they should not apply to coal stocks purchased before June 2017, on which they had already paid Clean Energy Cess under the Finance Act, 2010. The respondents are the Union of India and the Chairman of the GST Council. The petitioners' counsel was repeatedly absent during the proceedings.

Key Issues

1. Whether Section 8 of the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017, and the Goods and Services Tax Compensation Rules, 2017, along with Notification No.1/2017-Compensation Cess (Rate), dated June 28, 2017, are unconstitutional, oppressive, and ultra vires, and thus not applicable to the petitioners for the levy of Cess on coal stocks purchased up to June 2017. 2. Whether the respondents should be directed not to require the petitioners to pay additional levy for coal stocks purchased up to June 2017, on which Clean Energy Cess was already paid under the Finance Act, 2010. The petitioners argued that the impugned provisions were unconstitutional and should not apply to their pre-GST stock. They relied on the fact that they had already paid Clean Energy Cess. The respondents placed on record a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.10177 of 2018 (Union of India vs. Hind Energy and Coal Benefication (India Ltd.) and connected matters) which dealt with the validity of the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017.

Sections Cited

Section 8

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA ON THE 14th OF DECEMBER, 2022 WRIT PETITION No. 15044 of 2017 BETWEEN:-

1.

RANVIR KUMAR KARAN S/O SHRI GOPI RAMAN LAL KARAN, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PROPRIETOR- MAHIMA MARKETING BHARTIYAM SADAN, GANESH CHOWK, CIVIL LINES, KATNI DISTT. KATNI (M.P.)

2.

AMIT GOYAL S/O SHRI R.N. GOYAL, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PROPRIETOR MAHAMAYA COAL COMPANY. R/O GOYAL BHAWAN, RAJENDRANAGAR. GALI NO.8 SATNA (M.P.)

3.

BHARTENDRA SINGH S/O SHRI BAUCHAT SINGH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS OCCUPATION: PROP. MAA AMBAJI ENTERPRISES, DR. KHARE GALI PANNA MODE, KUTHALA, KATNI (M.P.)

4.

AMIT K. JAIN S/O SHRI MAHENDRA K. JAIN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PROP. PARASNATH COAL TRADERS, AMLAI CHOWK, BUDHAR, DISTRICT SHAHDOL (M.P.)

5.

ANUJ JAIN S/O SHRI U.C.JHAIN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PROP. MAHAVEER COAL RESOURCES PVT. LTD JAIN COMPLEX, PURENI KATNI (MADHYA PRADESH)

6.

ANURAG PODDAR S/O SHRI K.K. PODDAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AUTHORISED SINGNATORY- PODDAR COAL SALES, PODDAR PURI, CHAKA, KATNI (M.P.)

7.

VIVEK AGRAWAL

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.