Jagdish Arora vs. Union Of INDIA
Held
The Court held that the petition was to be dismissed as withdrawn. This decision was based solely on the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners to withdraw the petition. No findings were made on the merits of the case, and no reasoning beyond acceding to the withdrawal request was provided. The operative direction was to dismiss the petition as withdrawn.
Facts
The petitioners, Jagdish Arora and Ajay Arora, filed a miscellaneous criminal case before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur. The respondent was the Union of India, through the Senior Intelligence Officer, GST Intelligence. The case was listed for order on February 23, 2022. At the outset of the proceedings, the learned counsel for the petitioners prayed for the withdrawal of the petition.
Key Issues
The court had to decide whether to allow the withdrawal of the petition. The petitioners' counsel sought to withdraw the petition. The respondent's stance on the withdrawal is not recorded in the judgment. No specific legal provisions or precedents were discussed as the matter was disposed of on the petitioner's request for withdrawal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Learned counsel for petitioners at the very outset prays for withdrawal of this petition, which accordingly stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sateesh
1
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.