M/S B Agrawal Co. vs. Union Of INDIA

WP/17183/2020HC Madhya PradeshGST19 April 2023Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE2 pages
For Petitioner: Arpan Pawar
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court noted the request made by the petitioner's counsel. Based on this request, the High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. There was no adjudication on the merits of any GST-related issue. The Court did not delve into any specific provisions of the CGST Act or SGST Act, nor did it consider any arguments presented by the respondents. The operative direction was solely to dismiss the petition as withdrawn at the petitioner's behest.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s B Agrawal Co., through its Power of Attorney Holder, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The respondents included various authorities from the Union of India and the State of Madhya Pradesh, specifically concerning Goods and Services Tax (GST). The petition was filed in the year 2020. The specific tax period(s) and the exact order or action under challenge, as well as the amount in dispute, are not explicitly detailed in the provided order. The procedural history leading to this point is also not elaborated upon.

Key Issues

The Court had to decide whether to proceed with the writ petition. The petitioner's counsel requested the withdrawal of the writ petition. The respondents were represented by their respective counsel. No specific legal questions or arguments from either side regarding GST provisions, circulars, or precedents are recorded in the provided order. The sole action recorded is the petitioner's request for withdrawal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA ON THE 19th OF APRIL, 2023 WRIT PETITION No. 17183 of 2020 BETWEEN:- M/S B AGRAWAL CO. THROUGH PARTNER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER NAGENDRA PRATAP SINGH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS REGISTERED OFFICE MIG 30 NAVJEEVAN VIHAR VINDYA NAGAR SINGRAULI VINDYA NAGAR, DISTRICT SINGRAULI, M.P. .....PETITIONER (BY MS. AISHWARYA SINGH - ADVOCATE) AND 1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY MINISTER OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) 137, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI (DELHI)

2.

SECRETARY GENERAL MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE 4TH FLOOR A- WINGH RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD SHASHTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI, (DELHI)

3.

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH SECRETARY COMMERCIAL TEX DEPARTMENT VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL, M.P.

4.

THE COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX CENTRAL EXCISE GST BHAWAN MISSION CHOWK, NAPIER TOWAN JABALPUR, M.P.

5.

THE COMMISSIONER M.P. STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX MOTI BUNGALOW COMPOUND, M.G. ROAD NEAR GHANDHI HALL, INDORE, M.P. 1 (RAVI MALIM

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.