M/S Shri Ram Traders vs. Union Of INDIA
Held
The Court held that if the petitioner's contention regarding non-service of the show cause notice is correct, they have the remedy of filing an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 107 of the MPGST Act. The Court expressed hope that if the issue of non-service is verified to be true upon appeal, the appellate authority would address it in accordance with the law. The Court directed that the period spent during the pendency of the writ petition would be excluded for computing the period of limitation for filing the appeal. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Shri Ram Traders, filed a writ petition before the Madhya Pradesh High Court challenging an order of assessment passed by the State Tax Officer, Morena, under Section 74 of the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner contended that the assessment order was made ex-parte as they were not served with a show cause notice. The respondents, Union of India and the State Tax Officer, were not represented before the Court. The High Court noted that an appeal against the assessment order lies before the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 107 of the MPGST Act.
Key Issues
1. Whether the assessment order passed under Section 74 of the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017, is liable to be set aside on the ground that the petitioner was not served with a show cause notice, leading to an ex-parte assessment? The petitioner argued that the assessment order is bad in law because it was passed without providing them with an opportunity to be heard, specifically by failing to issue a show cause notice. They contended that this procedural lapse vitiates the entire assessment. The respondents did not present any arguments before the Court.
Sections Cited
Section 74, Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER This writ petition is directed against the order of assessment made by the respondent/State in exercise of the power under Section 74 of the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017. Admittedly, against the aforesaid order an appeal lies before the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 107 of MPGST Act. 1 (ROHIT ARYA) JUDGE (SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH) JUDGE Learned counsel for the petitioner while taking exception to the im
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.