M/S Shri Ram Traders vs. Union Of INDIA
Held
The High Court held that if the petitioner's claim of non-service of the show cause notice is correct, they have the remedy of filing an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 107 of the MPGST Act. The Court expressed hope that if the issue of non-service is verified and found to be true, the appellate authority would address it in accordance with the law. The Court also directed that the period spent during the pendency of the writ petition would be excluded while computing the period of limitation for filing the appeal. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Shri Ram Traders, has filed a writ petition challenging an order of assessment passed by the respondent/State Tax Officer under Section 74 of the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner contends that the assessment order was made ex-parte as they were not served with a show cause notice. The petition was heard by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior.
Key Issues
1. Whether the assessment order passed under Section 74 of the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017, is invalid due to the alleged non-service of a show cause notice on the petitioner? Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argues that the assessment order is bad in law as it was passed ex-parte without proper service of the show cause notice. They assert that this procedural lapse vitiates the entire assessment process. Revenue's contention: No specific arguments were recorded for the respondent revenue as they were not represented before the Court.
Sections Cited
Section 74, Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER This writ petition is directed against the order of assessment made by the respondent/State in exercise of the power under Section 74 of the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017. Admittedly, against the aforesaid order an appeal lies before the 1 (ROHIT ARYA) JUDGE (SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH) JUDGE Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 107 of MPGST Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner while taking e
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.