M/S Agarwal Fuel Corporation Private Limlited Thru. Vishnu Kushwaha vs. Union Of INDIA
Held
The Court held that the petitioner is not liable to pay IGST on ocean freight for services supplied by a person located in a non-taxable territory by way of transportation of goods by a vessel from a place outside India up to the customs station of clearance in India. This decision was based on the Apex Court's judgment in Union of India Vs. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd, 2022 SCC Online SC 657. The Court reasoned that the Apex Court had already settled this issue, establishing that such ocean freight charges do not constitute an 'import of service' under the IGST Act, and therefore, IGST is not leviable. Consequently, the impugned notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax (rate) dated June 28, 2017, and entry 10 of notification 10/2017 Integrated Tax (Rate) dated June 28, 2017, were quashed as being ultra vires the provisions of the IGST Act. The ratio decidendi is that ocean freight for goods imported into India is not taxable as an 'import of service' under the IGST Act, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Agarwal Fuel Corporation Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the levy of IGST on ocean freight. The petitioner is represented by Vishnu Kushwaha, Deputy Manager. The respondents are the Union of India, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, and the Secretary, Goods and Services Tax Council. The petition was filed in 2017. The core of the dispute revolves around the taxability of ocean freight for services supplied by entities located outside India, specifically for the transportation of goods by vessel from outside India to the Indian customs station. The impugned actions are notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax (rate) dated June 28, 2017, and entry 10 of notification 10/2017 Integrated Tax (Rate) dated June 28, 2017.
Key Issues
1. Whether the levy of IGST on ocean freight for services supplied by a person located in a non-taxable territory, by way of transportation of goods by a vessel from a place outside India up to the customs station of clearance in India, is legally sustainable under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? The petitioner, M/s Agarwal Fuel Corporation Private Limited, argued that IGST should not be leviable on ocean freight in the specified circumstances. The petitioner relied on the Apex Court's decision in Union of India Vs. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd, 2022 SCC Online SC 657, to support their contention. The respondents, Union of India and the Secretary, Goods and Services Tax Council, did not record any specific arguments in the judgment. However, their implicit stance was in favor of the levy, as evidenced by the notifications being challenged.
Sections Cited
Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Learned counsel for the parties jointly submits that the issue raised in this Keeping in view of the aforesai
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.