M/S Sneh Engineers And Developers (Proprietorship Firm) Through Its Proprietor Shri Lalit Purohit vs. Union Of INDIA Through Its Secretary

WP/16124/2024HC Madhya PradeshGST06 June 2024Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI2 pages
For Petitioner: Piyush ParasharFor Respondent: Deputy Solicitor General
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court accepted the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the writ petition. The Court granted the petitioner liberty to pursue a statutory appeal under the Finance Act, 1994, which may include filing an application for condonation of delay. The Court also permitted the petitioner to avail any other appropriate remedy available under the law. The reasoning for this decision was based on the petitioner's request to withdraw and pursue alternative remedies. No specific findings were made on the merits of the case, and no issues were expressly left undecided as the petition was withdrawn.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Sneh Engineers and Developers, through its proprietor Shri Lalit Purohit, filed a writ petition before the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Indore. The respondents included the Union of India, various CGST and Central Excise authorities, and Canara Bank. The specific tax period and the order or action under challenge, as well as the amount in dispute, are not explicitly recorded in the judgment. The procedural history indicates that the matter was listed for admission and urgent hearing was granted.

Key Issues

The Court was not required to decide any substantive issues of law or fact. The petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the writ petition after arguing the matter on merits for some time. The petitioner requested liberty to avail the remedy of a statutory appeal under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, along with an application for condonation of delay, or to pursue any other appropriate remedy. The respondents were not present and did not present any arguments.

Sections Cited

Finance Act, 1994

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI ON THE 6th OF JUNE, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 16124 of 2024 BETWEEN:- M/S. SNEH ENGINEERS AND DEVELOPERS (PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM), THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR, SHRI LALIT PUROHIT S/O SHRI JAGDISH CHANDRA PUROHIT, AGED 61 YEARS, ADDRESS: A-1, BASANT VIHAR, SUNDERWAS, UDAIPUR (RAJASTHAN) .....PETITIONER (BY SHRI PIYUSH PARASHAR - ADVOCATE.) AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI (DELHI) 110 001

2.

CHIEF COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, 35-C, GST BHAWAN, ADMINISTRATIVE AREA, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 462 011

3.

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, UJJAIN COMMISSIONERATE, CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE DEPARTMENT, UJJAIN, 29 BHARATPURI ADMINISTRATIVE AREA, UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)

4.

JOINT COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE AND CGST DIVISION RATLAM, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, MITRA NIWAS ROAD, RATLAM (MADHYA PRADESH)

5.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, RANGE III, CENTRAL EXCISE AND CGST DIVISION RATLAM, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, MITRA NIWAS 1 WP-16124-2

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.