M/S Vijay Singh vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh

WP/30871/2023HC Madhya PradeshGST24 January 2024Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL2 pages
For Petitioner: Pratap Tarun SinghFor Respondent: Advocate General
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court held that the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh could be granted. The Government Advocate for the respondents and the counsel for respondent No.4 (Assistant Commissioner, CGST) stated they had no objection to the withdrawal. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner the liberty to file a fresh petition. No substantive legal issues were decided on merits.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Vijay Singh, through its proprietor Shri Vijay Singh and authorized signatory Shri D.D. Kaushik, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The respondents include the State of Madhya Pradesh, various departments of Public Works Department (PWD), and the Assistant Commissioner, Central Tax, Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Division, Satna. The specific tax period and the order or action under challenge, as well as the amount in dispute, are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to this writ petition is also not detailed.

Key Issues

The Court did not have to decide any substantive issues of law or fact. The petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh. The respondents' counsel had no objection to this request. Therefore, the primary question before the Court was whether to grant the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition with liberty to refile.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL & JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN ON THE 24th OF JANUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 30871 of 2023 BETWEEN:- M/S VIJAY SINGH THROIUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI VIJAY SINGH REGISTERED ADDRESS 1711, S.P. MUKHERJEE, MARG, DELHI 110006, THROUGH SHRI D.D. KAUSHIK ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORYTHROUGH SHRI D.D. KAUSHIK ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SAXENA COLONY KATNI ROAD MAIHAR DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) .....PETITIONER (BY SHRI PRATEEK SINGH BAGHEL - ADVOCATE ) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2.

THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY COMMERCIAL TAX DEPARTM ENT VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

3.

THE COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAX MADHYA PRADESH MOTI BUNGALOW COURT COMPOUND M.G. ROAD INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

4.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CENTRAL TAX GOODS AND SERVICES TAX (CGST) DIVISION SATNA C.R. BUILDING CIVIL LINES SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

5.

THE CHIEF ENGINEER P W D (BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION) ZONE BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 1 (SUJOY PAUL) JUDG

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.