M/S Daksha Polymers Private Limited vs. The Asset Commissioner SGST
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER Per: Justice Vivek Rusia On 24.02.2025, the proxy counsel sought adjourment on behalf of Shri Ashutosh Upadhyay. Today also no one is present, therefore, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed in default. Vatan
1 WP-28488-2024 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:19086
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.