M/S Rainbow Crop Health Limited vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Held
The Court acknowledged that the petitioner has a remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The primary issue was the petitioner's inability to access the online portal for filing the appeal due to the cancellation of their GST registration. The Court accepted the petitioner's submission that the portal should be opened to allow them to avail their statutory remedy. The Court directed that the petitioner be permitted to file an appeal through the portal and, if necessary, the portal should be opened forthwith for this purpose. With this direction, the writ petition was disposed of. The Court did not decide on the merits of the cancellation order itself.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Rainbow Crop Health Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 02.01.2025 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax Circle-3, Division 1, Bhopal. This order cancelled the petitioner's GST registration under Section 73 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, for the period April 2021 to March 2022. The petitioner argued that while an appeal remedy under Section 107 of the GST Act exists, they were unable to file it online because their registration had been cancelled. They sought a direction to open the online portal to enable them to file the appeal.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner has a valid alternative remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, against the order cancelling their GST registration? 2. Whether the Court should direct the opening of the online portal to allow the petitioner to file their appeal, given the cancellation of their registration? Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner contended that they have a remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017. However, due to the cancellation of their GST registration, they are unable to file the appeal through the online portal and therefore prayed for a direction to open the portal for this purpose. Revenue's Contention: The learned Government Advocate for the respondent/State submitted that normally the facility to submit an appeal through the online portal is available to the assessee. If it is not available, then a direction may be issued to the respondents to facilitate the same.
Sections Cited
Section 73, Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER Per: Justice Vivek Rusia The petitioner has filed the present petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 02.01.2025 (Annexure P/6) whereby the Respondent No.3-Assistant Commissioner, State Tax Circle-3, Division 1, Bhopal has cancelled the GST registration under Section 73 of the Goods and Services Tax, 2017 for the period of April, 2021 to March, 2022. 2. Shri Prakash Upadhyay, Senior Advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has a remedy of appeal against the impugned order dated 02.01.2025 under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax, 2017, but 1 WP-2706-2026 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:9081 Signed by: SHIVANI TIWARI Signing time: 2/3/2026 11:18:59
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.