M/S Perfect Stonew Are Pipes Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner Appeals
Held
The Court held that the petitioner's prayer was reasonable. The Court modified its earlier order dated November 28, 2025, to the extent that the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the GST Tribunal. This liberty is to be exercised within 30 days from the date of commencement of filing before the Tribunal. The Court also clarified that any observations made in the previous writ petition shall not impede the petitioner's right to approach the Tribunal. The review petition was disposed of with this modification.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s. Perfect Stoneware Pipes Limited, had filed a writ petition which was dismissed by the High Court on November 28, 2025. At that time, the GST Tribunal was not functioning. The petitioner had already deposited 10% of the disputed amount. Subsequently, the GST Tribunals were directed to commence functioning. The petitioner filed a review petition seeking modification of the earlier dismissal order, arguing that with the Tribunal now operational, they have a remedy to challenge the revenue authorities' order before it. The revenue authorities were represented by the Joint Commissioner Appeals and others.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner should be granted liberty to approach the GST Tribunal, given that the Tribunal was not functional at the time of the initial writ petition dismissal, and the petitioner has since deposited 10% of the disputed amount. Petitioner's argument: The petitioner contended that the initial writ petition was dismissed due to the non-functioning of the GST Tribunal. Now that the Tribunal has commenced its operations, the petitioner should be allowed to pursue their remedy there. They also highlighted their compliance by depositing 10% of the disputed amount. Revenue's argument: The judgment does not record any specific arguments from the respondent/State. The Deputy Advocate General appeared for the State.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER Per: Justice Vivek Rusia Counsel for the petitioner submits that when the writ petition was dismissed on 28th November, 2025, the GST Tribunal was not started functioning. It is also submitted that the petitioner has already deposited 10% of the amount. Now all the GST Tribunal have been directed to join the duties to start the functioning; therefore, the petitioner is now having a remedy to approach the G.ST Tribunal challenging the impugned order passed by the revenue authorities.
The prayer made by the petitioner is reasonable.
In view of the above, the order dated 28th November, 2025 is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the 1 RP-8-2026 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:1966 Signed by: TARUN KUMAR SALUNKE Sign
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.