Seguro Foundations And Structures PVT LTD. vs. State Tax Officer(Works Contract)

WP(C)/11170/2019HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01028275201909 April 2019Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI3 pages
For Petitioner: SRI.RAJESH NAMBIAR, SRI.N.R.SAJ
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, Seguro Foundations and Structures Pvt Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala seeking a direction for the expeditious consideration and disposal of their appeals and stay petitions pending before the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals). The petitioner is represented by its Director. The respondents are the State Tax Officer (Works Contract) and the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) of the SGST Department. The appeals and stay petitions are related to orders passed by the revenue authorities. The petitioner sought a direction for the 2nd respondent to dispose of Exts.P5 & P6 stay petitions and Exts.P3 & P4 appeals.

Held

The Court directed the 2nd respondent, the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals), to consider and dispose of the stay petitions (Exts.P5 & P6) within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Furthermore, the Court directed the disposal of the appeals (Exts.P3 & P4) preferably within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. As an interim measure, recovery proceedings pursuant to the orders under appeal before the 2nd respondent were stayed for two months from the date of the judgment. The Court did not delve into the merits of the appeals or the stay petitions themselves, focusing solely on the procedural aspect of expeditious disposal.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Court should direct the respondent authority to expeditiously consider and dispose of the pending appeals and stay petitions filed by the petitioner? The petitioner argued for an expeditious disposal of their pending appeals and stay petitions before the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals). They sought a judicial intervention to ensure timely resolution of their grievances. The revenue/State did not record any specific arguments against the petitioner's prayer for expeditious disposal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI TUESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 19TH CHAITHRA, 1941 WP(C).No. 11170 of 2019 PETITIONER: SEGURO FOUNDATIONS AND STRUCTURES PVT LTD. NO.27/635, A4, SECOND FLOOR, CHAKKAPPAN CENTRE, TOLL GATE, EDAPPALLY P.O., COCHIN-682 024 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, DR.MOHAMMED SAGHEER. BY ADVS. SRI.RAJESH NAMBIAR SRI.N.R.SAJ RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE TAX OFFICER(WORKS CONTRACT) SGST DEPARTMENT, PERUMANOOR, KOCHI-682 015. 2 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM-682 015. SR. GP. C.K. GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2- WP(C).No. 11170 of 2019

JUDGMENT Heard Sri. Rajesh Nambiar, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. C.K Govindan, the learned Senior Government Pleader.

2.

The petitioner prays for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of Exts.P5 & P6 stay petitions and Exts.P3 & P4 appeals expeditiously.

3.

Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of Exts.P5 & P6 stay petitio

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.