The District Collector vs. M/S.Indian Rare Earths Limited
Facts
This case involves a Writ Appeal (WA(MD) No.1376 of 2017) filed by the District Collector, Kanyakumari District, against an order dated 21.04.2017 in WP(MD).No.4690 of 2017. The original writ petitioner, M/s. Indian Rare Earths Limited, sought a writ of mandamus directing the Commissioner of Geology and Mining to grant transport permits for mining leases. The writ appeal arises from the High Court's previous order which confirmed the writ petitioner's plea. Subsequently, the Supreme Court granted a stay on the judgment and directed the opening of new quarries. A status report filed by the Under Secretary to the Government, Public Works Department, details the prevailing prices of sand, including loading charges and GST, and outlines the online sand sales mechanism introduced by the government.
Held
The Court noted that the Writ Appeal was filed against an order dated 21.04.2017 in WP(MD).No.4690 of 2017, which was confirmed by a judgment dated 07.12.2017 in WA(MD)No.1376 of 2017. However, the Supreme Court has since granted a stay on this judgment and indicated that new quarries should be opened. The Court expressed a desire for a proper and correct mechanism for the sale of sand, its pricing, and to prevent illegal quarrying. Based on the status report, the Court directed that the price of sand per unit and other particulars should be uploaded on the website 'www.tnsand.in', and a screenshot of this information should be submitted on the next hearing date. The matter was kept pending for further consideration of the mechanism for sand sales and pricing. No specific finding was made on the primary issue of granting transport permits in this particular order, as the focus shifted to establishing a proper regulatory framework.
Key Issues
1. Whether the respondents are legally obligated to grant transport permits to the petitioner for the mining leases in question, as per the relevant Government Orders (G.O.Ms.1114 dated 12.08.1981 and G.O.3(D) 6 dated 28.01.2000)? (Question of law and fact, turning on administrative discretion and interpretation of mining lease conditions). Petitioner's Argument (implied from the prayer in the writ petition): The petitioner contends that they are entitled to transport permits based on the existing mining leases and seeks a mandamus to compel the authorities to issue them. Revenue/State's Argument (implied from the appeal): The appellant (District Collector) is challenging the High Court's earlier order that directed the grant of permits. The specific grounds of appeal are not detailed in the provided text, but the appeal itself indicates a dispute over the issuance of these permits. The status report discusses pricing mechanisms and GST, suggesting the revenue side is concerned with the financial and regulatory aspects of sand sales.
Sections Cited
Section 7, Section 129, Rule 86A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Juri iction )
Friday, the Twenty Third day of March Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.SATHYANARAYANAN and The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.HEMALATHA WA(MD) No.1376 of 2017 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, NAGERCOIL-629 001. ... APPELLANT/3rd RESPONDENT Vs 1 M/S.INDIAN RARE EARTHS LIMITED, MANAVALAKURICHI, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, PIN-629 252, REP BY ITS HEAD. ... 1st RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER 2 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIES (MMD1) DEPARTMENT, GOVT OF TAMILNADU, FORT ST.GEORGE, CHENNAI-9. 3 THE COMMISSIONER OF GEOLOGY AND MINING, GUINDY, CHENNAI-32. ... RESPONDENTS 2 & 3/ RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 Prayer in WA(MD) No.1376 of 2017: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 21/04/2017 in WP(MD).No.4690 of 2017. PRAYER IN WP(MD). No.4690 of 2017: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ of Mandamus direc
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.