R. Sabu vs. The Secretary TO Govt.

WP(MD)/25381/2019HC MadrasGSTCNR HCMD01112625201928 November 2019Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M. GOVINDARAJ3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, R. Sabu, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct the respondents (Government officials including the Secretary to Government, Mines and Minerals, District Collector, Assistant Director (Mines and Minerals), and Assistant Superintendent of Police) to allow the transportation of crusher dust, M-sand, gravel, and building materials from Tamil Nadu to Kerala through the Puliyarai check post. The petitioner sought this relief in light of a previous order by the same High Court in W.P(MD) No.4662/2019. The petitioner claimed to possess all the necessary certificates for transporting these materials. The respondents were represented by the Additional Government Pleader, and the matter was taken up for final disposal with consent.

Held

The Court disposed of the writ petition with directions. It noted that a Division Bench had passed an interim order regarding the transportation of M-sand, and the authorities are bound by such directions. The Court referred to a previous order in W.P(MD) No.2760 of 2018, where the District Collector had submitted a report listing five essential certificates for transporting crusher material: a valid Transport permit from the Mines Department, Pollution Control Board consent, permanent Registration certification from the District Industries Centre, a valid quarry licence, and a valid sales tax registration certificate (TIN Number and GST Number). The Court directed the respondents to permit the petitioner to transport the materials if they possessed all these documents. It was made clear that if any document was missing, the respondents were at liberty to prevent transportation. The Court also observed that if the petitioner possessed a valid permit for crusher dust obtained from a permitted quarry, the respondents should not prevent its transportation, but the respondents retained the liberty to check vehicles and demand documents.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to permit the transportation of crusher dust, M-sand, gravel, and building materials from Tamil Nadu to Kerala through the Puliyarai check post, given the existence of prior court orders and the petitioner's possession of required documents? The petitioner argued that they are in possession of all the necessary certificates as stipulated by the authorities, and therefore, should be allowed to transport the materials. They also referred to a previous order in an identical issue (W.P(MD) No.2760 of 2018) where the District Collector had submitted a report listing the required certificates. The petitioner contended that there is no bar to transporting crusher dust if a valid permit from a permitted quarry is produced. The respondents, through the Additional Government Pleader, took notice and consented to the disposal of the petition.

Sections Cited

GST Number

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
W.P.(MD)No.25381 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.11.2019 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ W.P.(MD)No.25381 of 2019 and WMP(MD)No.21956 of 2019 R.Sabu .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Mines and Minerals Secretariat, Chennai – 9. 2.The District Collector, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Assistant Director (Mines and Minerals), Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District. 4.The Assistant Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein and their men from preventing the petitioner from transporting crusher dust, M-sand, gravel and building materials from Tamilnadu to Kerala through Puliyarai check post at Tirunelveli District in the light of the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD) No.4662/2019. For Petitioner : Mr.F.Deepak For Respondents : Mr.P.Kannithevan Additional Government Pleader

Mr.P.Kannithevan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the w

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.