M.Paraman vs. The State Bank Of INDIA

WP(MD)/21442/2014HC MadrasGSTCNR HCMD01088994201407 January 2021Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH,HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.ANANTHI (RETD.)2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

These three writ petitions were filed by M. Paraman, P. Bose, and P.V. Vijayaprakash seeking a writ of mandamus to prevent the first respondent, the State Bank of India, from evicting them from their respective shop premises without following the procedure under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The petitioners were tenants in buildings owned by the second respondent, M. Palanikumar. The petitions were filed in 2014. The tax period is not specified. The core issue revolves around the eviction procedure from the leased premises.

Held

The Court noted that there was no representation for the petitioners. The learned counsel for the second respondent (owner) submitted that the loan due to the first respondent (Bank) had been paid. Consequently, the Court held that nothing further survived for adjudication in these writ petitions. Based on this submission, the Court decided that the writ petitions stood closed. The reasoning was that the underlying cause for potential eviction, presumably related to the Bank's dues, had been resolved. Therefore, the procedural challenge under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act became moot. No specific finding was given on the applicability of the Act to the Bank's actions, as the matter was disposed of on the basis of the payment.

Key Issues

1. Whether the eviction of the petitioners from the leased premises by the first respondent (State Bank of India) is liable to be set aside for non-adherence to the procedure contemplated under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act? (Question of law). The petitioners argued that any eviction must comply with the specific provisions of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The respondents' counsel submitted that the loan due to the first respondent (Bank) had been paid, rendering the writ petitions infructuous. No specific arguments were recorded for the petitioners regarding the payment of loan or the Bank's right to evict, beyond the procedural challenge.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (3 matters)

WP(MD)No.21442/14
WP(MD)No.21443/14
WP(MD)No.21444/14

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
W.P.(MD)Nos.21442 to 21444 of 2014 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.01.2021 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI W.P.(MD)Nos.21442 to 21444 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1-1-1 of 2014 M.Paraman : Petitioner in WP(MD)No.21442/14 P.Bose : Petitioner in WP(MD)No.21443/14 P.V.VIjayaprakash : Petitioner in WP(MD)No.21444/14 Vs. 1. The State Bank of India, represented through its Authorized Officer, Siruzholil Branch, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Kappalur, Madurai – 625 008. 2. M.Palanikumar : Respondents in all W.P.s COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the 1st respondent from directly or indirectly evicting the petitioners from the building (Shop Nos.4, 2 & 3 respectively) bearing No.3/331 Door No.1, 1A GST Road, Thanakkankulam, Madurai – 625 006, without adhering the procedure contemplated under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.Aravindan for R.2 [In all W.P.s] *****

(Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)

There is

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.