Tvl. Agr Sign Boards vs. State Tax Officer
Held
The Court noted the submission by the learned Government Advocate that the petitioner possesses an alternative remedy of appeal before the appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST), Trichy, under Section 107 of the TNGST Act, 2017. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appellate authority. The petitioner was permitted to raise all grounds raised in the writ petition before the appellate authority. The Court directed that if an appeal is filed within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order, it shall be entertained by the appellate authority without insisting on the limitation period and be disposed of in accordance with law within one month thereafter. No costs were awarded. The Court did not decide the merits of the petitioner's claim regarding the violation of natural justice.
Facts
The petitioner, Tvl. AGR SIGN BOARDS, represented by its Proprietor, filed a writ petition challenging an assessment order dated 14.08.2024, passed by the respondent, the State Tax Officer, for the assessment year 2019-2020. The petitioner contended that the assessment order was passed without providing sufficient opportunity, violating the principles of natural justice. The respondent argued that a show cause notice was issued on 27.05.2024 and that the petitioner has an alternative appeal remedy under Section 107 of the TNGST Act, 2017, before the appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST), Trichy. The respondent submitted that the petitioner approached the High Court directly without exhausting the statutory appeal mechanism.
Key Issues
1. Whether the assessment order dated 14.08.2024, passed by the respondent for the assessment year 2019-2020, is liable to be quashed on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice due to insufficient opportunity provided to the petitioner? (Question of law and fact, turning on principles of natural justice and procedural fairness). Petitioner's contention: The assessment order was passed without affording adequate opportunity to the petitioner, thus violating the principles of natural justice and rendering the order liable for setting aside. Respondent's contention: A show cause notice was duly issued to the petitioner on 27.05.2024. The petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy of appeal under Section 107 of the TNGST Act, 2017, and should have availed it instead of directly approaching the High Court. The respondent relied on the existence of the statutory appeal provision.
Sections Cited
Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: and
This writ petition is filed challenging the assessment order passed by the respondent, dated 14.08 .2024, for the assessment year 2019-2020. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order of assessment for the year 2019-2020
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Madras High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.